Tenancy

Copyright © 2024 LexisNexis

This topic explains the types of tenancies used in England and Wales. The type of tenancy provides the legal framework for the respective rights and responsibilities of each party.

The focus of this topic is primarily on social housing provision. Practice Note: Main differences—secure, introductory and flexible tenancies sets out the primary differences between the various types of social housing tenancy, including the term and status of the tenancy, the type of landlord, and the right to buy. However, increasingly, local housing authorities (LHAs) are discharging their homelessness duties, pursuant to the Housing Act 1996, by arranging a private rented sector (PRS) offer to end their main housing duty—see Practice Note: A summary of types of private residential tenancies, which explains the fundamentals of private sector agreements.

Tenancies provided by LHAs

Tenancies provided by LHAs will generally be:

  1. •

    secure

  2. •

    flexible

  3. •

    introductory

When bringing a possession action, the type of tenancy will determine which notices need to be served, which procedures are to be followed, and which (if any) statutory regime applies to protect the tenant's occupation.

Secure tenancy

Secure tenancies are the most common form

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Local Government News

Welsh Government publishes guidance on KPIs under Procurement Act 2023

The Welsh Government has published technical guidance on key performance indicators (KPIs) as mandated by the Procurement Act 2023 and the Procurement (Wales) Regulations 2024, SI 2024/782. This guidance outlines the new legal requirements for Welsh contracting authorities to set, publish, and assess at least three KPIs for public contracts valued over £5m. It defines KPIs, provides an overview of the legal framework governing their use, and specifies the requirement to assess supplier performance against these indicators annually. The guidance also introduces a standardised rating system for performance assessment, clarifies the publication requirements for KPI-related information in various procurement notices, and highlights the potential consequences of poor performance, including new discretionary exclusion grounds.

GCF introduces new Procurement Specific Questionnaire

The Government Commercial Function (GCF) has unveiled a new Procurement Specific Questionnaire as part of its Procurement Pathway service. This questionnaire is designed to replace the Standard Selection Questionnaire previously used under the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (PCR). The new tool aims to streamline the procurement process by enabling contracting authorities to obtain core supplier information from a central digital platform, along with additional exclusions, debarment information, and details relating to conditions of participation. The questionnaire is applicable across various stages of the procurement process, including business need definition, finalising and publishing procurement packs, supplier engagement, selection and clarification and due diligence. This development represents a significant update to the UK's procurement procedures, potentially simplifying and enhancing the efficiency of the supplier selection process.

Court of Appeal confirms the considerations and requirements for re-determination of a previously quashed approval of a DCO (Save Stonehenge World Heritage Site v Secretary of State for Transport)

Planning analysis: In Save Stonehenge World Heritage Site v Secretary of State for Transport, the court had to consider whether the process of redetermining a development consent order (DCO) previously quashed by the court had been conducted fairly and properly. It confirmed that public decision making involved in the DCO procedure is not a form of litigation. As such, the statutory process and common law principles of procedural fairness do not dictate that issues must always be considered by an inquisitorial process. Where there is not a statutory requirement for an inquisitorial process (such as on redetermined DCOs), claimants need to demonstrate that there was a particular need for evidence to be interrogated such as between independent experts on the issues under further consideration. Moreover, for claimants to prove procedural unfairness they must show that they have suffered material prejudice. Neither were established in this case.

Government responds to consultation on changes to regulations relating to the CQC

The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) has publishes the consultation outcome on proposed amendments to the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014, SI 2014/2936. The primary outcome is the decision to remove the regulations' expiry date of 31 March 2025 and institute a five-year review cycle. Responses to other suggestions in the consultation were broadly positive however DHSC has concluded that there needs to be more consideration before implementing these proposed changes through legislation.

View Local Government by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Did local authority discharge its relief duty and comply with Housing Act 1996 (Moge v London Borough of

Local Government analysis: The issue in this appeal was whether the London Borough of Ealing (‘Ealing’), when seeking to discharge its relief duty under section 189B of the Housing Act 1996 (HA 1996), namely to take reasonable steps to her the appellant secure accommodation, had acted in accordance

Succession to secure tenancy challenge dismissed by the Court of Appeal (Dudley MBC v Mailley)

Local Government analysis: Section 87(b) of the Housing Act 1985 (HA 1985) was not of discriminatory effect in respect of the daughter of a secure tenant by preventing the daughter succeeding to the tenancy on the secure tenant dying while permanently residing at a care home. The daughter could not

Intentional homelessness, affordability and reasonable expenditure (Patel v London Borough of Hackney)

Local Government analysis: Patel v LB Hackney is a Court of Appeal case arising from a section 204 of the Housing Act 1996 (HA 1996) statutory homeless appeal following a decision of intentional homelessness. The appellant had been found to have become homeless intentionally following the loss of

Arms length management organisations (ALMOs)

Arms length management organisations (ALMOs)An arms length management organisation (ALMO) is a not-for-profit company that provides housing services on behalf of a local housing authority (LHA). Usually an ALMO is set up by the LHA to manage and improve all or part of its housing stock with the LHA
Did local authority discharge its relief duty and comply with Housing Act 1996 (Moge v London Borough of

Did local authority discharge its relief duty and comply with Housing Act 1996 (Moge v London Borough of

Local Government analysis: The issue in this appeal was whether the London Borough of Ealing (‘Ealing’), when seeking to discharge its relief duty under section 189B of the Housing Act 1996 (HA 1996), namely to take reasonable steps to her the appellant secure accommodation, had acted in accordance

Succession to secure tenancy challenge dismissed by the Court of Appeal (Dudley MBC v Mailley)

Succession to secure tenancy challenge dismissed by the Court of Appeal (Dudley MBC v Mailley)

Local Government analysis: Section 87(b) of the Housing Act 1985 (HA 1985) was not of discriminatory effect in respect of the daughter of a secure tenant by preventing the daughter succeeding to the tenancy on the secure tenant dying while permanently residing at a care home. The daughter could not

Intentional homelessness, affordability and reasonable expenditure (Patel v London Borough of Hackney)

Intentional homelessness, affordability and reasonable expenditure (Patel v London Borough of Hackney)

Local Government analysis: Patel v LB Hackney is a Court of Appeal case arising from a section 204 of the Housing Act 1996 (HA 1996) statutory homeless appeal following a decision of intentional homelessness. The appellant had been found to have become homeless intentionally following the loss of

Arms length management organisations (ALMOs)

Arms length management organisations (ALMOs)

Arms length management organisations (ALMOs)An arms length management organisation (ALMO) is a not-for-profit company that provides housing services on behalf of a local housing authority (LHA). Usually an ALMO is set up by the LHA to manage and improve all or part of its housing stock with the LHA