Home / Ireland - Corporate / Competition / Competition

Legal News

Eight deals are under formal foreign-subsidy review, EU official says

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
Published on: 27 November 2023
Published by an MLex correspondent

Table of contents

  • Public procurement
  • Ex officio

Article summary

MLex: Eight M&A deals have been notified to the European Commission under new rules screening distortive foreign subsidies, and a further 26 cases are in preliminary discussions, EU official Eddy de Smijter has said.

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
Ireland

Related documents:

4 News
View More
6 Practice notes
View More
Powered by Lexis+®

Related documents:

4 News
View More
6 Practice notes
View More

Popular documents

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?What is an appeal?An appeal in insolvency proceedings is no different to an appeal in normal litigation. An appeal will be allowed only if the appeal court is satisfied that the decision of the lower court was 'wrong' or 'unjust because of a

Financial clean break orders in family proceedings

Financial clean break orders in family proceedingsDuty of the court to consider a clean breakAlthough there is no presumption in favour of there being a financial clean break between parties on divorce, the court is under a duty to consider whether it would be appropriate to exercise its powers so

Late payment penalties—inheritance tax

Late payment penalties—inheritance taxWhile interest often accrues on overdue tax, the late payment of certain taxes may also attract a penalty. For information on the interest accruing on overdue tax, see Practice Notes: IHT—payment deadlines on death—Interest on IHT and Interest on late paid

Brussels I (recast)—domicile (Arts 4 and 63) [Archived]

Brussels I (recast)—domicile (Arts 4 and 63) [Archived]ARCHIVED: This Practice Note has been archived and is not maintained.This Practice Note considers the general rule set out in Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 1215/2012, Brussels I (recast) when determining the relevance of a defendant’s domicile to