Home / Local Government / Social housing / Development and management

Legal News

High Court decision brings clarity on councils’ decision-making powers (Peters v Haringey London Borough Council)

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

Published on: 21 February 2018

Published by a LexisNexis Local Government expert

Table of contents

What are the practical implications of the case?
What was the background?
What did the court decide?
Ground 1—lawfulness of using an LLP
Ground 2—duty to consult under LGA 1999, s 3
Ground 3—public sector equality duty
Ground 4—should the decision have been taken by full council?

Article summary

Local Government analysis: The decision in Peters v Haringey LBC serves as a reminder that councils have considerable duties and responsibilities when entering into any joint venture or commercial agreement. Judith Barnes, partner, Richard Hiscoke, senior associate, and Claire Booth, professional support lawyer at Bevan Brittan, consider the case.

Popular documents

Demoted tenancies

Demoted tenanciesDemotionA secure tenancy can be demoted to a 12-month probationary tenancy if the tenant has engaged in housing related anti-social conduct or has used the property for unlawful purposes. If a demotion order is granted and the tenant remains in occupation then on a specified date

Housing disrepair for local authority landlords—a practical guide

Housing disrepair for local authority landlords—a practical guideThis Practice Note discusses disrepair claims in relation to social housing, setting out the legal basis for a claim and other the relevant factors that need to be considered.The basis for a disrepair claimIt is important to understand

Eviction upheld as appeal based on public sector equality duty fails (Powell v Dacorum Borough Council)

Local Government analysis: Powell v Dacorum Borough Council concerned an appeal against a decision to refuse a tenant a stay of eviction. The defendant argued that the local authority had failed to give any consideration to the public sector equality duty (PSED) (section 149 of the Equality Act

Succession to secure tenancy challenge dismissed by the Court of Appeal (Dudley MBC v Mailley)

Local Government analysis: Section 87(b) of the Housing Act 1985 (HA 1985) was not of discriminatory effect in respect of the daughter of a secure tenant by preventing the daughter succeeding to the tenancy on the secure tenant dying while permanently residing at a care home. The daughter could not