Home / Financial Services / Key developments and horizon scanning / Anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing (AML/CTF)

Legal News

Raid on broker in cum-ex fraud case was lawful, court says

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
Published on: 30 April 2024
Published by a Law360 reporter

Article summary

Law360: A raid on the London office of commodity brokerage MCML Ltd following a request from Danish prosecutors investigating an alleged £56m tax fraud was lawful, a London court ruled on 17 April 2024.

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Related documents:

2 Checklists
4 News
View More
2 Practice notes
4 Q&As
View More
Powered by Lexis+®

Related documents:

2 Checklists
4 News
View More
2 Practice notes
4 Q&As
View More

Popular documents

Investigations & Enforcement Trends 2023—a perfect storm for regulatory enforcement

Financial Services analysis: Tracey Dovaston, partner, and Alessia de Quincey, counsel, of Pallas Partners LLP, consider the investigations and enforcement trends which have generated attention in the past year and highlight the trends they expect to see in 2023 revolving around financial crime,

Scotland—the process for applying for sequestration

Scotland—the process for applying for sequestrationSequestration in Scotland is the legal process by which an insolvent debtor’s estate is gathered in, realised and then distributed among their creditors by a trustee appointed for that purpose. The process requires that a formal award of

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?

What is the difference between an appeal and a review?What is an appeal?An appeal in insolvency proceedings is no different to an appeal in normal litigation. An appeal will be allowed only if the appeal court is satisfied that the decision of the lower court was 'wrong' or 'unjust because of a

Financial clean break orders in family proceedings

Financial clean break orders in family proceedingsDuty of the court to consider a clean breakAlthough there is no presumption in favour of there being a financial clean break between parties on divorce, the court is under a duty to consider whether it would be appropriate to exercise its powers so