Scheme closure

An increasing number of companies have closed their defined benefit (DB) occupational pension scheme to the accrual of future benefits and opened up a new defined contribution (DC) scheme instead for future service benefits.

Closing a scheme to future accrual of benefits is often not straightforward, and sponsoring employers and trustees will need to take into account a number of considerations before proceeding.

Where a closure proposal requires trustee consent, the trustees will need to be convinced that the employer has a good business case for closure before agreeing to the proposal. Employers should be prepared to provide evidence of their business case and to explain the financial and business impact for them if the scheme is not closed. The employer may also need to explain whether it considered any other options for reducing the costs and risks of the scheme falling short of full closure and, if so, why it discounted them.

Trustees may also look to obtain some advantage for members in return for agreeing to closure such as additional funding or security for the scheme.

Employer considerations

The main considerations for a sponsoring employer

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Pensions News

PDP survey finds most pension providers ready for connection to dashboard ecosystem

The Pensions Dashboards Programme (PDP) has published a statement reaffirming the government's commitment to delivering pensions dashboards and sharing survey insights from a sample of FCA-regulated pension providers.  The 'Pensions Dashboards Readiness Survey',  undertaken by Ipsos between October and November 2024 on 130 FCA-regulated pension providers, indicates that more than 90% of providers intended to connect to the dashboards ecosystem before or by their ‘connect by’ dates as set out in the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) guidance of March 2024. Also, more than 8 in 10 of respondents said all their data used for matching people to their pensions on dashboards was held digitally, while 85% of respondents reported that they were very or completely confident in their ability to meet the connection requirements while also maintaining their digital readiness. The survey is meant to be viewed as a ‘snapshot’ of dashboard readiness at the end of 2024, approximately 6 months ahead of the first connection date set out in the DWP guidance. Although some providers may face initial challenges in meeting the voluntary deadlines, the PDP notes that regulators have emphasised a flexible approach that avoids punitive measures, instead aiming to ensure that all providers eventually connect by 31 October 2026, thereby supporting improved retirement planning for individuals.

Police injury benefits: consultation outcome on 12-Month rule compatibility with statutory obligations published

The Home Office has published the consultation outcome on the subject of the 12-month rule in regulation 12 of the Police (Injury Benefit) Regulations 2006, SI 2006/932. Regulation 11 provides for the payment of injury awards for police officers who, as a result of injury received in the course of duty, have been permanently disabled and are unable to continue in the role. An injury award consists of a pension and a gratuity. Regulation 12 provides a significant additional gratuity for police officers who become totally and permanently disabled within 12 months of an injury. The additional gratuity is five times the annual value of the officer’s pensionable pay. The consultation, which ran between 12 May 2021 and 7 July 2021, examined the 12-month rule's compatibility with the Equality Act 2010, focusing on its impact on mental health injuries compared to physical injuries. Most respondents felt the 12-month rule was inconsistent with the Equality Act and did not adequately address progressive mental health conditions. However, there was no consensus among representative organisations, and the data collected was inconclusive. The Home Office therefore intends to gather more focused data and evidence through an engagement exercise with stakeholders and medical experts before considering any changes to regulation 12. However, if sufficient evidence and data support an amendment to regulation 12, the Home Office will consult further on any proposed changes.

View Pensions by content type :

Popular documents