Civil appeals to the County Court and the High Court

For detail of the structure and hierarchy of civil courts in England and Wales, see: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary—Structure of Courts and Tribunals System.

CPR provisions

Civil appeals to the County Court, High Court and Court of Appeal are generally governed by Part 52 of the CPR. General guidance on civil appeals can be found in Civil appeals: general and preliminary considerations—overview.

In addition to the provisions set out in CPR 52 and CPR PD 52A, practitioners appealing in the County Court or in the High Court also need to comply with the additional provisions set out in CPR PD 52B.

For guidance on the provisions in force before 1 October 2012, see 'Appeals before 1 October 2012' below.

Amendments have been made to appeals including CPR 52, CPR PD 52A, CPR PD 52B, CPR PD 52C and CPR PD 52D taking effect on 3 October 2016, with transitional provisions in respect of CPR 52 and CPR PD 52C. For further details of the 3 October 2016 changes see Practice Note: Changes to Part 52 in October

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest PI & Clinical Negligence News

Minutes of the CPR Committee meeting—1 November 2024

The minutes of the CPR Committee (CPRC) meeting of 1 November 2024 (conducted in a hybrid format at The Rolls Building (Royal Courts of Justice) and via video conference) cover a number of issues including the Law Commission consultation on the law of contempt, Closed Material Procedure, Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation, the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024, the outcome of the Workplace Claims consultation and costs budgeting light.

PI & Clinical Negligence weekly highlights—19 December 2024

This week's edition of PI & Clinical Negligence weekly highlights includes confirmation from the Court Funds Office on a further reduction in interest rates for basic and special accounts, and details of the MOJ’s response to a consultation on revisions to the medical reporting process for road traffic accident claims. We consider a decision that found the Court of Protection did have jurisdiction to determine a dispute over the claimant’s deputy’s release from reverse indemnity undertakings and a clinical negligence case where anonymity was refused as materials already in the public domain about the claimant’s health rendered any attempt at anonymisation futile and unjustified. We also bring you our usual roundup of other news, cases and New Law Journal articles of interest.

Online Procedure Rule Committee minutes—2024 in review

The Online Procedure Rule Committee (OPRC), established under the Judicial Review and Courts Act 2022 (JRACA 2022), creates rules governing the practice and procedure for specific types of online court and tribunal proceedings across the Civil, Family and Tribunal jurisdictions (CFT). The OPRC holds regular meetings, for which the minutes are published. This News Analysis summarises the key developments in 2024 and looks forward to potential future developments.

Court of Appeal clarifies when a dissolved partnership may bring litigation (Flohr v Frontiers Capital I Ltd Partnership)

Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: The Court of Appeal has confirmed that the authority to bind a firm for the purposes of its winding up (conferred on partners after the dissolution of a partnership by section 38 of the Partnership Act 1890 (PA 1890)) applies to pursuing causes of action which accrued prior to dissolution. Whether PA 1890, s 38 will permit partners of a dissolved partnership to pursue litigation post-dissolution is a fact sensitive question. The question is whether such litigation is reasonably required in all the circumstances to wind up the affairs of the partnership. Relevant considerations are not circumscribed and will include considerations of prospects of success and cost-effectiveness. In Flohr, the Court of Appeal confirmed a general partner of a limited partnership governed by the Limited Partnership Act 1907 (LPA 1907) was empowered to sue a third party on behalf of the partnership notwithstanding the dissolution and winding up of the partnership. This was so even though the relevant cause of action arose prior to dissolution. Written by James Fagan, Barrister, at Radcliffe Chambers.

View PI & Clinical Negligence by content type :

News