Parties and their representatives

The types of party that may be involved in litigation may vary. Litigation may be commenced or defended by individuals (including children), corporations, partnerships, sole traders, insolvent individuals or companies, groups and the estate of a deceased party. Those that bring or defend claims may instruct a legal professional to manage their claim or defence, or may choose to deal with the matter without legal representation (known as litigants in person or self-represented litigants). For an overview of the types of parties which may become involved (whether as claimant or defendant) in litigation in England and Wales, and the key procedural issues and practical considerations of which they or their legal advisors should be aware, see Practice Note: Dispute resolution—types of party.

For information on bringing or defending a claim on behalf of a person lacking capacity, see Practice Note: Capacity to litigate.

Multi-party actions

Claims may be brought or defended by multiple parties. Group claims (also known as class actions or multi-party claims) may be pursued before the English courts via several procedural mechanisms (including group litigation orders (GLOs) and representative claims referred to below). For an overview of the

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest PI & Clinical Negligence News

Ministry of Justice sets new personal injury discount rate at positive 0.5%

The Lord Chancellor, Rt Hon Shabana Mahmood MP, has announced a new personal injury discount rate of positive 0.5% for England and Wales, to be effective from 11 January 2025. This new rate will be applied when calculating lump sum compensation payments for future financial losses in personal injury cases. The Lord Chancellor concluded that it would be inappropriate to adopt a dual or multiple rate at this review and that the rate should be set at a single rate of positive 0.5%. This decision follows a comprehensive review process under the Damages Act 1996, which included two Calls for Evidence, consultation with statutory consultees and evidence from an independent expert panel. A Statutory Instrument will be laid in Parliament to implement this change. A full statement of reasons has been made available.

UT considers taxpayer’s application for permanent anonymity and third party disclosure request (HMRC v The Taxpayer and Others)

Tax analysis: The Upper Tribunal (UT) rejected a taxpayer’s application for permanent anonymity, following the taxpayer's decision to withdraw their substantive appeal with the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT). The UT further granted a third party limited access to the FTT’s previous case management decision. The UT’s decision emphasises the importance placed on open justice and highlights the court and tribunals’ reluctance to permit anonymity in litigation. Written by Helen McGhee, Partner, and Megan Durnford, Associate, at Joseph Hage Aaronson LLP.

PI & Clinical Negligence weekly highlights—28 November 2024

This week's edition of PI & Clinical Negligence weekly highlights includes expert analyses of the CJC’s final report on Pre-Action Protocols and the MoJ’s statutory review of whiplash injury regulations. We bring you details of the 175th Practice Direction update and the DHSC’s findings from the call for evidence on the statutory duty of candour. We also include our usual roundup of other news, cases and New Law Journal articles of interest.

Reforming the Personal Injury Pre-Action Protocols

Personal Injury and Clinical Negligence analysis: The Civil Justice Council (CJC) has concluded its extensive review of the various existing pre-action protocols (PAPs). Here we focus specifically on the Personal Injury PAPs.

View PI & Clinical Negligence by content type :

News