Statements of case

Statements of case

The statements of case in a claim form the main documents that set out the parties’ positions in the matter and enable the court to manage the claim. Statements of case are sometimes also referred to as ‘pleadings’. Which documents comprise ‘statements of case’ is set out in CPR 2.3(1).

The CPR contain rules setting out what the statements of case must contain, and this will in many cases depend on the type of statement of case and the nature of the claim. It must also include a statement of truth. For information on drafting statements of case in general, see Practice Note: Drafting statements of case.

Statements of case must be verified by a statement of truth (CPR 22.1(1)(a)). Statements of truth are used to confirm that the person signing the document has an honest belief in the accuracy and content of the document being signed. The CPR set out the exact wording that must be used, and who must sign the statement of truth, including where a solicitor may sign on behalf of their client. Failure to sign the statement of

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest PI & Clinical Negligence News

Ministry of Justice sets new personal injury discount rate at positive 0.5%

The Lord Chancellor, Rt Hon Shabana Mahmood MP, has announced a new personal injury discount rate of positive 0.5% for England and Wales, to be effective from 11 January 2025. This new rate will be applied when calculating lump sum compensation payments for future financial losses in personal injury cases. The Lord Chancellor concluded that it would be inappropriate to adopt a dual or multiple rate at this review and that the rate should be set at a single rate of positive 0.5%. This decision follows a comprehensive review process under the Damages Act 1996, which included two Calls for Evidence, consultation with statutory consultees and evidence from an independent expert panel. A Statutory Instrument will be laid in Parliament to implement this change. A full statement of reasons has been made available.

UT considers taxpayer’s application for permanent anonymity and third party disclosure request (HMRC v The Taxpayer and Others)

Tax analysis: The Upper Tribunal (UT) rejected a taxpayer’s application for permanent anonymity, following the taxpayer's decision to withdraw their substantive appeal with the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT). The UT further granted a third party limited access to the FTT’s previous case management decision. The UT’s decision emphasises the importance placed on open justice and highlights the court and tribunals’ reluctance to permit anonymity in litigation. Written by Helen McGhee, Partner, and Megan Durnford, Associate, at Joseph Hage Aaronson LLP.

PI & Clinical Negligence weekly highlights—28 November 2024

This week's edition of PI & Clinical Negligence weekly highlights includes expert analyses of the CJC’s final report on Pre-Action Protocols and the MoJ’s statutory review of whiplash injury regulations. We bring you details of the 175th Practice Direction update and the DHSC’s findings from the call for evidence on the statutory duty of candour. We also include our usual roundup of other news, cases and New Law Journal articles of interest.

Reforming the Personal Injury Pre-Action Protocols

Personal Injury and Clinical Negligence analysis: The Civil Justice Council (CJC) has concluded its extensive review of the various existing pre-action protocols (PAPs). Here we focus specifically on the Personal Injury PAPs.

View PI & Clinical Negligence by content type :

News