Managing legal risk

Managing legal risk

All commercially successful organisations take risks. Without taking risks, an organisation will stand still, which is a risk in itself.

Organisations take risks in return for increased revenue or profit. Commercial organisations are unlikely to want to eliminate risk altogether, but to control it so they can reap the benefits of taking risks while mitigating potential negative consequences.

What is risk?

The informal notion of risk as the chance that ‘something bad might happen’ is one place to start to define risk. A more tangible and easily understood approach is to define risk as probability multiplied by impact.

So, for any given legal risk faced by your business, there are two questions:

•
how likely is it that the risk will materialise, ie what’s the probability?
•
if the risk does materialise, how bad will it be, ie what’s the impact?

You can then evaluate the risk, by adopting a simple risk matrix or scoring system.

How likely is it that the risk will materialise, ie what’s the probability?	Assign a score to your answer between 1 and 5 (where 1 = very low probability and 5 = maximum probability)
If

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Practice Compliance News

EDPB approves certification criteria for EU Data Protection Seal under EU GDPR

The European Data Protection Board (EDPB) has approved the certification criteria for the EU Data Protection Seal, a mechanism to certify compliance with EU General Data Protection Regulation, Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (EU GDPR) in data processing operations, including transfers to third countries. This seal helps establish appropriate safeguards for data transfers, offering a uniform standard of assurance across the EU. It also specifies the roles of supervisory authorities, accreditation bodies, and certification bodies in maintaining consistent application of GDPR rules

Workers could get six months to bring any employment tribunal claims

Law360: Workers would get six months rather than three to bring any employment tribunal claims under a proposed amendment to the Employment Rights Bill, a move that a lawyer has said 'strikes the right balance'.

Spotlight on Corruption reports on OFSI sanctions enforcement

Spotlight on Corruption publishes a report on the recent Commons Treasury Select Committee hearing with the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI). The report highlights UK's underwhelming record on sanctions enforcement. With only one £15,000 fine imposed since 2022, zero criminal convictions since 2012, and less than £m in assets seized, enforcement remains feeble. However, OFSI's caseload has increased to over 400 investigations, and the Foreign Secretary has confirmed a government review of sanctions is underway. The hearing also revealed potential for improved cooperation between OFSI and law enforcement, though concerns about transparency persist. These developments suggest a possible shift towards more robust sanctions enforcement in the near future, pending the outcomes of ongoing cases and the government's review.

Practice Compliance weekly highlights—28 November 2024

This week's edition of Practice Compliance weekly highlights includes: the new Practice Compliance forecast, the latest sanctions news, the launch of a bribery investigation into defence firm Thales by the SFO, INTERPOL’s successful global operation against financial cybercrime and the extension of liability of the new failure to prevent fraud offence into corporate enviro fraud.

View Practice Compliance by content type :

News