The Court of Protection and supporting services

Jurisdiction

The Court of Protection as we know it today was created by the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA 2005), which came into force on 1 October 2007, and has jurisdiction over the property, financial affairs, personal welfare and healthcare of people who lack mental capacity to make decisions for themselves.

Prior to 1 October 2007, applications to the Court of Protection under the jurisdiction of the Mental Health Act 1983 (MeHA 1983) were handled by the Public Guardianship Office. Under the new jurisdiction of MCA 2005, the Court of Protection is a separate self-contained body that is responsible for handling its own applications and processes.

Although the powers of the Court of Protection are defined by MCA 2005, its authority can only be exercised by the judges nominated by the Lord Chancellor who must be from among the judges specified in MCA 2005, s 46(2), which include a range of judges from district judges to the President of the Family Division. MCA 2005 therefore provides for the exercise of the court's powers at different judicial levels.

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Private Client News

OPG upgrades processing time for LPA applications

The Office of the Public Guardian (OPG) has announced that, as of 2 December 2024, the updated processing time for lasting power of attorney (LPA) applications is eight to ten weeks, reducing from 16 weeks. This includes a statutory waiting period of four weeks.

MPs vote in favour of Assisted Dying Bill

The Terminally Ill (End of Life) Bill has passed its second reading in the House of Commons on Friday 29 November. The Bill proposes allowing terminally ill individuals with a life expectancy of six months or less the option to end their lives with medical assistance. MPs voted 330 to 275 in support of the Bill.

New Supreme Court Practice Directions published

The Supreme Court has published the Supreme Court Practice Directions, November 2024.

UT considers taxpayer’s application for permanent anonymity and third party disclosure request (HMRC v The Taxpayer and Others)

Tax analysis: The Upper Tribunal (UT) rejected a taxpayer’s application for permanent anonymity, following the taxpayer's decision to withdraw their substantive appeal with the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT). The UT further granted a third party limited access to the FTT’s previous case management decision. The UT’s decision emphasises the importance placed on open justice and highlights the court and tribunals’ reluctance to permit anonymity in litigation. Written by Helen McGhee, Partner, and Megan Durnford, Associate, at Joseph Hage Aaronson LLP.