Capacity

Capacity

Mental capacity is the ability to perform a specific juristic act by understanding and making a decision to do something that has legal consequences, such as make a Will, a power of attorney or a gift, or to provide consent for something. Mental incapacity is the inability to do something or to provide consent for something by reason of a mental disorder or disability. Lack of mental capacity is not always constant; it may fluctuate. It will also vary according to the function that requires the decision or consent and, for this reason, mental capacity is referred to as being 'function specific'.

The legislation governing mental capacity in England and Wales in the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA 2005). For an introduction to the subject of mental capacity and the provisions of MCA 2005 and the accompanying Code of Practice, see Practice Notes: Mental capacity—an introduction and Mental Capacity Act 2005—the Codes of Practice.

Mental capacity—an introduction

Mental capacity is an issue that must be to the forefront of a practitioner's mind in everything they do, particularly in respect of Wills whether that be in connection with

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Private Client News

Private Client weekly highlights—21 November 2024

This week’s edition of Private Client highlights includes: (1) Wigglesworth v Beetson, in which the claimant failed in an action for estoppel and adverse possession; (2) the Hansard Society to host a briefing on parliamentary process for Assisted Dying Bill; (3) Khan v Khan, which considered family property and constructive trusts; (4) analysis of the Autumn Budget announcement to bring unused pension funds and death benefits within the scope of IHT; (5) Palmer v Sans, which found that there was no transaction at an undervalue where property was already held on trust for the transferee; (6) KA v FA (The Secretary of State for the Home Department intervening), where the court recognised an overseas adoption notwithstanding failure of common law test; and (7) Kireeva v Bedzhamov, in which the Supreme Court has confirmed the application of the immovables rule to English property.

HoL committee issues call for evidence on Property (Digital Assets etc) Bill

A Special Public Bill Committee established by the House of Lords has issued a call for evidence on the Property (Digital Assets etc) Bill. The deadline for submissions is Friday 20 December 2024.

Privy Council rules BVI company shares are not immovable property (Al Thani v Al Thani)

Private Client analysis: In a decision which will come as a relief to private individuals who own shares in BVI companies, the Privy Council has decided that section 245 of the BVI’s Business Companies Act 2004 does not have the effect of re-categorising shares as immovable property for the purposes of succession. Written by Kyle Bonnell, pupil at XXIV Old Buildings.

Supreme Court confirms application of immovables rule to English property

The Supreme Court has unanimously dismissed Ms Kireeva’s (Russian bankruptcy trustee’s) appeal to overturn the Court of Appeal’s’ decision regarding matters arising out of the bankruptcy of Mr Bedzhamov. Peter Declercq and Patrick Elliot, partners at DCQ Legal (who acted for Ms Kireeva), discuss the implications of the judgment.