Companies

Companies

A company is a separate legal entity, distinct from its members. It is owned by its members (also known as shareholders) and it is managed by its directors. It is regulated by the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006).

The types of company that can be incorporated under CA 2006 are:

•
a public company limited by shares (a public company must have shares and cannot be limited by guarantee or unlimited)
•
a private company limited by shares
•
a private company limited by guarantee (which are primarily used by charities and other not-for-profit organisations—see Practice Note: Companies limited by guarantee), and
•
an unlimited company (which are relatively rare—see Practice Note: Unlimited companies)

Incorporation

A company is formed by one or more persons (the subscribers):

•
subscribing their names to a memorandum of association, and
•
complying with the registration requirements set out in CA 2006

The company is incorporated when the Registrar of Companies issues it with a certificate of incorporation.

A person wanting to set up a company has the following options:

•
they can incorporate a new

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Private Client News

Private Client weekly highlights—8 May 2025

This week’s edition of Private Client highlights includes: (1) Re LV, a difficult decision of the Court of Protection to allow feeding of anorexic P while under sedation; (2) the DHSC and MoJ publish impact assessments for the Terminally Ill Adults Bill; (3) analysis of the legal implications of the UK’s social care crisis; (4) Thomas v Jones, where a series of separate findings of fact which, while not individually conclusive, together painted a picture from which the court could infer the presence of the necessary purpose for a claim under section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986; (5) Accuro Trust (Switzerland) SA (as trustee of the Tiodab Trust) v RCC, where the FTT found that HMRC had misinterpreted section 255 of the Inheritance Tax Act 1984 concerning additions to a trust; and (6) Beard v RCC, in which the Court of Appeal dismissed the taxpayer’s appeal, confirming that distributions from an offshore share premium account were not ‘dividends of a capital nature’ under section 402(4) of the Income Tax (Trading and Other Income) Act 2005.

Question of the week: Where a donor of a lasting power of attorney appoints an attorney who lives overseas, under what circumstances can the attorney be reimbursed from the donor's bank accounts to fund their travel when returning to the UK?

This Q&A considers whether, if where a donor of a lasting power of attorney appoints an attorney who lives overseas, under what circumstances can the attorney be reimbursed from the donor's bank accounts to fund their travel when returning to the UK.

Navigating the crossroads—legal implications of the UK's social care crisis

Private Client analysis: The UK's adult social care sector stands at a critical juncture, grappling with financial strains, workforce challenges, and systemic inefficiencies. For legal professionals advising clients in the healthcare and social care industries, understanding these multifaceted issues is essential.

Anorexia and Feeding under Sedation—in P’s Best Interests? (Re LV, by her Litigation Friend, the Official Solicitor)

Private Client analysis: Declarations were sought by NHS Trusts under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA 2005) that LV, a 20-year-old woman, lacked mental capacity to conduct proceedings and make decisions about her care and treatment, and that it was lawful and in LV’s best interests to undergo feeding whilst sedated within the Intensive Therapy Unit (ITU). LV was detained and receiving treatment under section 3 of the Mental Health Act 1983 (MeHA 1983) on an eating disorder unit for anorexia nervosa, which included being restrained and force-fed with a naso-gastric tube. This treatment was not successful as, in summary, LV would regurgitate most, if not all, of the feed meaning that she was losing body weight. The medical evidence demonstrated that absent this step being taken, LV would die within days or weeks. This was an urgent application and there was insufficient time for the Official Solicitor to obtain LV’s wishes and feelings directly. The Official Solicitor had consented to the application after hearing the evidence which included oral evidence from four consultants. Written by Sophie Caseley, barrister at Garden Court Chambers.