Public sector contract termination

This subtopic is aimed at public sector lawyers dealing with contract matters and considers some of the key issues and circumstances which may arise in relation to contract termination.

A contract may be discharged in a number of ways, including:

•
performance—where the parties are discharged from further performance once they have completed their obligations under the contract
•
effluxion of time—where a contract has been put in place for a specific period of time and expires (unless extended)
•
discharge by agreement—where the parties agree to bring the contract to an end
•
void contracts—where a contract is void by reason of mistake, misapprehension, or statute
•
rescission—where one party is entitled to rescind the contract by reason of the other party’s misrepresentation, undue influence or duress
•
force majeure—where the contract provides for termination in the event of force majeure
•
frustration—where some unforeseen event prevents the parties from performing the contract
•
termination—where are party exercises termination rights set out within the contract
•
breach—where one party is in breach of contract, entitling the other party to terminate the contract

For

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Public Law News

No police duty to protect from third party harm—applying the Tindall principles (Chief Constable of Northamptonshire Police v Woodcock, HD and others v Chief Constable of Wiltshire Police)

PI & Clinical Negligence analysis: In this conjoined appeal, the Court of Appeal considered whether the police held a duty of care to protect Ms Woodcock and CJ from harm caused by a third party; and whether the police’s investigative duty, pursuant to Article 3 of the European Convention of Human Rights, can arise before the claimant has suffered ill treatment at the hands of a third party. This decision represents the first occasion upon which the Court of Appeal has been asked to apply the Supreme Court’s decision in Tindall v Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police and has provided some important points of practical application to practitioners in this area. Written by Jennie Oborne, barrister at Deka Chambers.

Constitution Committee publishes sixth report of session 2024–25 on the Executive oversight and responsibility for the UK constitution

The Lords Select Committee on the Constitution has published its sixth report of session 2024–25 on the Executive oversight and responsibility for the UK constitution. The report covers the introduction which highlights the constitution and its guardians and safeguarding the constitution: stewardship and policy; the centre for government; the role of the ministers; the decision-making around the constitution; and the council of the nations and the regions.

House of Lords Constitution Committee calls for protection of UK constitution

The House of Lords Constitution Committee has published a report advocating for enhanced measures to protect the UK constitution. Key recommendations include appointing a senior minister to advise the Prime Minister on constitutional matters, potentially enshrining advisory bodies' roles in statute, and amending the Attorney General's oath to emphasise their duty to the rule of law. The Committee also proposes embedding constitutional considerations more firmly in the policy-making process and calls for greater transparency regarding responsibility for the Council of Nations and Regions. These proposals aim to bolster institutional safeguards and mitigate risks associated with the flexibility of the UK's uncodified constitution, particularly in light of recent constitutional stresses.

JCSI publishes twelfth report of session 2024–2025 scrutinising statutory instruments

The Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments (JCSI) has published its twelfth report of session 2024—2025. The following instruments have been drawn to the special attention of both Houses: the London Port Health Authority Order 2024; and the Power to Award Degrees etc. (The University of Law Ltd) Order of Council 2018 (Amendment) Order 2024.The JCSI scrutinises SIs made in exercise of powers granted by an Act of Parliament. Instruments not laid before Parliament are included within the JCSI’s remit, but local instruments and instruments made by devolved administrations are not considered by the JCSI, unless they are required to be laid before Parliament. The role of the JCSI, whose membership is drawn from both Houses of Parliament, is to assess the technical qualities of each instrument that falls within its remit and to decide whether to draw the special attention of each House to any instrument. At its meeting on 22 January 2025, the JCSI scrutinised a number of instruments in accordance with Standing Orders. It was agreed that the special attention of both Houses should be drawn to two of those considered.