Follower and accelerated payments notices

On 17 July 2014, the Finance Act 2014 (FA 2014) introduced two anti-avoidance provisions available for HMRC to combat perceived tax avoidance—follower notices and accelerated payment notices (APNs) or partner payment notices (PPNs). For the key points to note about follower notices and APNs/PPNs, see: Quick guide to follower notices and APNs—checklist.

What are follower notices?

Provided four conditions are met, HMRC can give follower notices to taxpayers who have used an avoidance scheme that has been shown to fail in another person's litigation (ie an earlier final judicial ruling). A follower notice is designed to counteract the tax advantage by incentivising the recipient of the follower notice to concede to HMRC's view and to take any necessary corrective action, such as amending a return or a claim, or to drop its appeal in accordance with the earlier final judicial ruling and therefore save HMRC the time and expense of having to litigate the same issue again. Failure to take corrective action within the required time gives rise to a penalty. For more information, see Practice Note: Follower notices.

A follower

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Tax News

FTT holds that sales of occupation income provisions applied to capital sum received by the taxpayer (Rupert Grint v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In Rupert Grint v HMRC, the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) found that the sales of occupation income anti-avoidance rules applied to a capital sum received by the taxpayer on the incorporation of his business. The anti-avoidance provisions were engaged as, although there were commercial reasons for the incorporation, one of the main objects of the arrangements was the avoidance or a reduction in income tax. The FTT also held that the closure notice was validly issued despite referring to the wrong legislative provision.

FTT holds discrimination settlement payment not taxable (L v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In L v HMRC, the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) held that the part of a settlement payment which related to a discrimination claim fell outside the scope of income tax. This was on the basis that the payment was not ‘from employment’; instead it was made because the discrimination had deprived the former employee of the opportunity to perform her full role, causing financial loss.

FTT allows taxpayer’s R&D appeal (Stage One Creative Services Ltd v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In Stage One Creative Services Ltd v HMRC, the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) allowed the taxpayer’s appeal, holding that it was entitled to research and development (R&D) relief under the pre-1 April 2024 regime for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

UT considers taxpayer’s application for permanent anonymity and third party disclosure request (HMRC v The Taxpayer and Others)

Tax analysis: The Upper Tribunal (UT) rejected a taxpayer’s application for permanent anonymity, following the taxpayer's decision to withdraw their substantive appeal with the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT). The UT further granted a third party limited access to the FTT’s previous case management decision. The UT’s decision emphasises the importance placed on open justice and highlights the court and tribunals’ reluctance to permit anonymity in litigation. Written by Helen McGhee, Partner, and Megan Durnford, Associate, at Joseph Hage Aaronson LLP.