The general anti-abuse rule

When does the GAAR apply?

The UK's general anti-abuse rule (the GAAR):

•
counteracts (by the making of adjustments on a just and reasonable basis by HMRC or the taxpayer)
•
tax advantages that would, ignoring the GAAR, arise from abusive tax arrangements, and
•
has applied since 17 July 2013 (the date of Royal Assent to the Finance Act 2013 (FA 2013)) except that, in respect of National Insurance contributions (NICs), it has only applied since 13 March 2014

The GAAR only has effect in relation to arrangements that are entered into on or after the commencement date (17 July 2013 or, for NICs, 13 March 2014). If the arrangements form part of a wider set of arrangements that include pre-commencement arrangements, the GAAR ignores the pre-commencement arrangements unless they can demonstrate that the post-commencement arrangements are not abusive.

See Practice Note: The general anti-abuse rule (GAAR) and Flowchart: Does the GAAR apply?

The GAAR forms part of the UK's anti-avoidance framework

The GAAR:

•
takes priority over other parts of tax legislation, and
•
forms part of the UK's anti-avoidance framework that includes:

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Tax News

FTT holds that sales of occupation income provisions applied to capital sum received by the taxpayer (Rupert Grint v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In Rupert Grint v HMRC, the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) found that the sales of occupation income anti-avoidance rules applied to a capital sum received by the taxpayer on the incorporation of his business. The anti-avoidance provisions were engaged as, although there were commercial reasons for the incorporation, one of the main objects of the arrangements was the avoidance or a reduction in income tax. The FTT also held that the closure notice was validly issued despite referring to the wrong legislative provision.

FTT holds discrimination settlement payment not taxable (L v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In L v HMRC, the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) held that the part of a settlement payment which related to a discrimination claim fell outside the scope of income tax. This was on the basis that the payment was not ‘from employment’; instead it was made because the discrimination had deprived the former employee of the opportunity to perform her full role, causing financial loss.

FTT allows taxpayer’s R&D appeal (Stage One Creative Services Ltd v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In Stage One Creative Services Ltd v HMRC, the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) allowed the taxpayer’s appeal, holding that it was entitled to research and development (R&D) relief under the pre-1 April 2024 regime for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

UT considers taxpayer’s application for permanent anonymity and third party disclosure request (HMRC v The Taxpayer and Others)

Tax analysis: The Upper Tribunal (UT) rejected a taxpayer’s application for permanent anonymity, following the taxpayer's decision to withdraw their substantive appeal with the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT). The UT further granted a third party limited access to the FTT’s previous case management decision. The UT’s decision emphasises the importance placed on open justice and highlights the court and tribunals’ reluctance to permit anonymity in litigation. Written by Helen McGhee, Partner, and Megan Durnford, Associate, at Joseph Hage Aaronson LLP.