Internet of things

The Internet of Things (IoT) is a term commonly given to everyday objects connected to the internet. IoT technology is applied to objects as diverse as running shoes, buildings (or parts of them), cars, household white goods and drones.

There is no single accepted definition of the IoT. A suitable working definition for lawyers might be: 'the synthesis of various technologies that allow real-world things (known as objects) to wirelessly interact with each other and/or their environment’. The IoT raises legal concerns and poses legal challenges in a number of areas, including:

•
competition law and technical standards
•
issues of consent, data protection and privacy
•
contract issues—IoT connectivity may mean that manufacturers of objects could have an on-going role in the repair and upgrading of said objects post-purchase, which is likely to necessitate a move from standard product warranties to a service-type contract model more like that currently used for software
•
criminal law and security of infrastructure
•
negligence and product liability
•
public health issues

See Practice Note: Internet of Things (IoT)—key legal issues.

Internet of things and data protection

Objects

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest TMT News

TMT weekly highlights—21 November 2024

Welcome to this week’s edition of the TMT weekly highlights: a hand-picked summary of news analysis, updates and new content from across the technology, media and telecoms sectors. These highlights focus on key topics including new technologies, software, cloud computing, internet, outsourcing, music, film & television, publishing, defamation and telecoms.

ASA rulings—20 November 2024

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has upheld a ruling on two paid-for Google ads for The Pure Gold Company, a gold and silver retail dealer. The ads were identified through the ASA's proactive monitoring as part of its wider work on unregulated investments. The ASA found the ads were misleading as they failed to illustrate the risks of gold investments. The ASA upheld the complaint.

DSIT outlines new online safety priorities for Ofcom implementation

The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) has published a Statement of Strategic Priorities (SSP) for Ofcom, the online safety regulator, as it prepares to enforce the Online Safety Act from Spring 2025. The SSP focuses on embedding safety by design, increasing platform transparency, and creating a resilient digital world. DSIT has also launched a study to explore the effects of social media on children's wellbeing, aiming to strengthen the evidence base for future policy decisions. The government has committed to refining the Act's implementation based on Ofcom's reports and input from online safety experts and campaigners.

UK payments regulator sees competitiveness objective introduced via the backdoor

MLex: Until now, the UK's payments regulator has avoided the additional scrutiny that a competitiveness and growth remit brings with it. Following a letter from the finance minister to the Payment Systems Regulator (PSR) on 14 November 2024, that appears to have changed. In executing its functions, the PSR must now have regard to the government's growth and competitiveness strategy. That is likely to prove a flashpoint for the fintech sector, which has been irked by the PSR over its handling of fraud reimbursement rules.