Parties and their representatives

The types of party that may be involved in litigation may vary. Litigation may be commenced or defended by individuals (including children), corporations, partnerships, sole traders, insolvent individuals or companies, groups and the estate of a deceased party. Those that bring or defend claims may instruct a legal professional to manage their claim or defence, or may choose to deal with the matter without legal representation (known as litigants in person or self-represented litigants). For an overview of the types of parties which may become involved (whether as claimant or defendant) in litigation in England and Wales, and the key procedural issues and practical considerations of which they or their legal advisors should be aware, see Practice Note: Dispute resolution—types of party.

For information on bringing or defending a claim on behalf of a person lacking capacity, see Practice Note: Capacity to litigate.

Multi-party actions

Claims may be brought or defended by multiple parties. Group claims (also known as class actions or multi-party claims) may be pursued before the English courts via several procedural mechanisms (including group litigation orders (GLOs) and representative claims referred to below). For an overview of the

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Dispute Resolution News

Application for payment into a US account or into court under section 44 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (O v C)

Arbitration analysis: Faced with an application for payment of the proceeds of a sale of cargo into a blocked account with a US financial institution, the judge ordered payment into court. Sir Nigel Teare decided that there was no real risk of the claimant being prosecuted for breaching sanctions by making a payment into court and a payment into court was more likely to give effect to the arbitration than a payment to a blocked account held at a US financial institution. Written by Jennifer Haywood, arbitrator, mediator and barrister at Serle Court.

MoJ publishes annual report and accounts for 2023-2024

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has released its annual report and accounts for the financial year 2023-2024 on 14 November 2024. This comprehensive document outlines the department's activities, performance against strategic objectives, governance structures and resource utilisation for the year ending 31 March 2024. Prepared in accordance with HM Treasury's Government Financial Reporting Manual, the report consolidates results from the core department, executive agencies and relevant arm's length bodies.

Dispute Resolution weekly highlights—14 November 2024

This week's edition of Dispute Resolution weekly highlights includes the minutes of the Civil Procedure Rule Committee’s meeting of 4 October 2024 and the Supreme Court decision in Unite the Union v Tyne and Wear Passenger Transport Executive T/A Nexus (rectification); dates for your diary; details of our most recently published content; and other information of general interest to dispute resolution practitioners.

Misrepresentation, implied terms and settlement agreements (Pentagon Food Group Ltd v B Cadman Ltd)

Dispute Resolution analysis: Pentagon Food Group Ltd v B Cadman Ltd centred on the interpretation and alleged breach of a settlement agreement concluded between the parties in relation to a previous set of proceedings. In this judgment, which serves as a helpful reference for practitioners on several legal issues, the High Court considered whether misrepresentations contained in a party’s pleadings may be actionable, as well as the circumstances in which representations, either express or implied, made during the course of a mediation could form the basis of a claim in misrepresentation, in the absence of a finding of unambiguous impropriety. The court also considered the test for implication of terms into the settlement agreement, and the law applicable to the construction of express contractual terms, ultimately finding the defendant to be liable for breach of an express and/or implied term of the settlement agreement, and in misrepresentation for statements made during the course of the mediation which led to the conclusion thereof. Written by Emily Lodge, associate at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan UK LLP.

View Dispute Resolution by content type :

News