Scottish DR: case management and evidence

This subtopic provides guidance on how to progress a civil claim in the Scottish courts and the handling of evidence in a Scottish civil action.

For guidance on other key aspects of Scottish civil litigation, see the following overviews, which link through to more detailed guidance:

  1. Scottish DR: key developments—overview

  2. Scottish DR: courts and civil procedure—overview

  3. Scottish DR: prescription and limitation—overview

  4. Scottish DR: starting a claim—overview

  5. Scottish DR: expenses and funding—overview

  6. Scottish DR: civil appeals and judicial review—overview

  7. Scottish DR: claims and remedies—overview

  8. Scottish DR: enforcement—overview

  9. Scottish DR: settlement and ADR—overview

Case management

Once a civil claim has been raised and defences have been lodged, there are various procedural steps that need to be taken to progress the claim to the point of fixing a substantive hearing such as a debate or proof.

The applicable court rules will set out the standard procedure that a case will ordinarily follow and they may specify that certain requests must be made by motion. In addition, parties may wish to

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Dispute Resolution News

Withholding DSAR documents from inspection during data protection proceedings by relying on a Data Protection Act 2018 exemption (Cole v Marlborough College)

Information Law analysis: This claim relates to the scope of production and the application of the exemptions to production of personal data in responding fully to a subject access request. The Claimant, Thomas Cole (Cole), who was a student at the Defendant school, Marlborough College (the College), submitted a data subject access request (DSAR) under Article 15 of the United Kingdom General Data Protection Regulation, Assimilated Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (the UK GDPR) after he was removed from the school following his involvement in a physical altercation with another student. In this half-day case management hearing, Mr Justice Nicklin assessed whether the College was entitled to withhold, in whole or part, documents containing Cole’s personal data, rather than providing the material for inspection ahead of a two-day trial on the data protection claim expected to start in mid-2025. The court held that the College was entitled to withhold some documents (containing Cole’s personal data) on the grounds of the exemption in paragraph 16 of Schedule 2, Part 3 to the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA 2018). In short, this exemption provides that a controller is not obliged to disclose information to a data subject where doing so involves disclosing information that relates to another individual who can be identified from that information, whether as the source of information or as the subject of such information. Written by Robyn Bond, associate at Ropes & Gray International LLP.

View Dispute Resolution by content type :

Popular documents