Scottish DR: civil appeals and judicial review

This subtopic provides guidance on how to appeal decisions of the Court of Session and sheriff courts in Scotland and how to challenge the decisions of public bodies by way of judicial review.

For guidance on other key aspects of Scottish civil litigation, see the following overviews, which link through to more detailed guidance:

  1. Scottish DR: key developments—overview

  2. Scottish DR: courts and civil procedure—overview

  3. Scottish DR: prescription and limitation—overview

  4. Scottish DR: starting a claim—overview

  5. Scottish DR: case management and evidence—overview

  6. Scottish DR: expenses and funding—overview

  7. Scottish DR: claims and remedies—overview

  8. Scottish DR: enforcement—overview

  9. Scottish DR: settlement and ADR—overview

Civil appeals in Scotland

For a broad outline of the civil appeal court structure in Scotland, see: Civil court structure in Scotland—flowchart and Practice Note: Civil court structure in Scotland.

The Sheriff Appeal Court (civil) hears appeals against certain decisions of the sheriff courts in Scotland. It came into being in 2016 as part of Scottish civil court reforms.

In civil matters, the Inner House of the Court

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Dispute Resolution News

Withholding DSAR documents from inspection during data protection proceedings by relying on a Data Protection Act 2018 exemption (Cole v Marlborough College)

Information Law analysis: This claim relates to the scope of production and the application of the exemptions to production of personal data in responding fully to a subject access request. The Claimant, Thomas Cole (Cole), who was a student at the Defendant school, Marlborough College (the College), submitted a data subject access request (DSAR) under Article 15 of the United Kingdom General Data Protection Regulation, Assimilated Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (the UK GDPR) after he was removed from the school following his involvement in a physical altercation with another student. In this half-day case management hearing, Mr Justice Nicklin assessed whether the College was entitled to withhold, in whole or part, documents containing Cole’s personal data, rather than providing the material for inspection ahead of a two-day trial on the data protection claim expected to start in mid-2025. The court held that the College was entitled to withhold some documents (containing Cole’s personal data) on the grounds of the exemption in paragraph 16 of Schedule 2, Part 3 to the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA 2018). In short, this exemption provides that a controller is not obliged to disclose information to a data subject where doing so involves disclosing information that relates to another individual who can be identified from that information, whether as the source of information or as the subject of such information. Written by Robyn Bond, associate at Ropes & Gray International LLP.

View Dispute Resolution by content type :

Popular documents