Periodical payments for children

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

General considerations

Most child maintenance is determined under the statutory scheme established by the Child Support Act 1991 (as amended). All new applications are dealt with by the Child Maintenance Service (CMS), with existing cases to migrate to the gross maintenance formula introduced by the Child Maintenance and Other Payments Act 2008.

Under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973) and the equivalent provisions under the Civil Partnership Act 2004 (CPA 2004), the court has the power to make an order for periodical payments, including secured periodical payments, to a party for the benefit of a child of the family. Those powers are severely restricted by the statutory scheme in cases where the relevant children are the biological or adoptive children of the prospective payer. There are limited circumstances in which the courts retain jurisdiction to make an order, including, for example, an order made by consent or an order where one of the parents is habitually resident overseas.

See Practice Notes: Child support—respective jurisdictions of the Child Maintenance Service

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Family News

Courts and Tribunals Judiciary publishes updated AI guidance and introduces Copilot Chat for judges

The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published updated guidance on the use of artificial intelligence (AI), replacing its December 2023 guidance. The updated guidance expands the glossary of AI terms and adds new sections on misinformation, bias and dataset quality. It introduces Microsoft Copilot Chat for judicial office holders through eJudiciary accounts and establishes that litigants bear responsibility for AI-generated information presented to courts. The guidance applies to all judicial office holders, clerks, assistants and support staff under the Lady Chief Justice and Senior President of Tribunals.

Family weekly highlights—10 April 2025

This week's edition of Family weekly highlights includes details of updated court fees and the launch of the express financial remedy procedure pilot scheme. Recent decisions on transparency in Family Law Act 1996 proceedings, Wells sharing in financial remedy proceedings and costs orders where intervenors are involved are detailed. A new Practice Note on the express financial remedy pilot scheme, together with an accompanying procedural guide are also set out.

Court of Protection maintains jurisdiction over child living in India (Irwin Mitchell Trust Corporation Ltd v KS)

Private Client analysis: Irwin Mitchell Trust Corporation Ltd v KS & Orsraises important questions about the jurisdictional limits of the Court of Protection in England and Wales (EWCOP). It is the first time that the EWCOP has had to decide whether it has jurisdiction to make orders about the property and affairs of a child under 16 who is habitually resident abroad, and what happens to a deputyship when a protected party moves abroad. Written by Alice Collier, senior associate at Irwin Mitchell LLP.

Family weekly highlights—3 April 2025

This week's edition of Family weekly highlights includes details of an evaluation report released by the Ministry of Justice on the Pathfinder pilot scheme and minutes of the Online Procedure Rule Committee meeting. Recent decisions on adoption orders and parental orders for children born via international surrogacy arrangements are detailed. A new Family public law HMCTS online service release notes tracker in Family Practical Guidance is also set out.

View Family by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Which financial statement should I use: Form E, Form E1 or Form E2?

Which financial statement should I use: Form E, Form E1 or Form E2?The court form prescribed financial statement is used to set out each party's relevant financial and other circumstances when a financial application has been made. Both parties are required to simultaneously exchange with each

Pension sharing orders

Pension sharing ordersThis Practice Note explains what a pension sharing order is within family proceedings and sets out which pension rights can be shared and which cannot be shared. It also sets out the key features of a pension sharing order including pension credits and pension debits, variation

Capitalised maintenance—Duxbury calculations

Capitalised maintenance—Duxbury calculationsThis Practice Note provides guidance on the basis and use of Duxbury calculations in relation to the calculation of capitalised spousal or civil partner maintenance/periodical payments, within financial remedy proceedings, including the assumptions made,

Specimen narrative statement in financial remedy applications under Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, s 25

Specimen narrative statement in financial remedy applications under Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, s 25In the FAMILY COURT SITTING AT [court location]No. [number]Between[applicant name]Applicantand[respondent name]RespondentI, [AB], of [address], state as follows:Introduction1I am the Applicant in
Which financial statement should I use: Form E, Form E1 or Form E2?

Which financial statement should I use: Form E, Form E1 or Form E2?

Which financial statement should I use: Form E, Form E1 or Form E2?The court form prescribed financial statement is used to set out each party's relevant financial and other circumstances when a financial application has been made. Both parties are required to simultaneously exchange with each

Pension sharing orders

Pension sharing orders

Pension sharing ordersThis Practice Note explains what a pension sharing order is within family proceedings and sets out which pension rights can be shared and which cannot be shared. It also sets out the key features of a pension sharing order including pension credits and pension debits, variation

Capitalised maintenance—Duxbury calculations

Capitalised maintenance—Duxbury calculations

Capitalised maintenance—Duxbury calculationsThis Practice Note provides guidance on the basis and use of Duxbury calculations in relation to the calculation of capitalised spousal or civil partner maintenance/periodical payments, within financial remedy proceedings, including the assumptions made,

Specimen narrative statement in financial remedy applications under Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, s 25

Specimen narrative statement in financial remedy applications under Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, s 25

Specimen narrative statement in financial remedy applications under Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, s 25In the FAMILY COURT SITTING AT [court location]No. [number]Between[applicant name]Applicantand[respondent name]RespondentI, [AB], of [address], state as follows:Introduction1I am the Applicant in