Trusts

Trusts

The court must consider the financial resources the parties have or are likely to have in the foreseeable future under section 25(2)(a) of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973) and Schedule 5, Part 5 to the Civil Partnership Act 2004 (CPA 2004). If a party to a marriage or civil partnership is a beneficiary or potential beneficiary under a trust, their interest may be regarded as a financial resource. The court's approach will depend on the nature of their interest and the broader circumstances of the case. A trust may be varied if it is a nuptial settlement—‘relevant settlement’ is the terminology adopted by CPA 2004, Sch 5, Pt 5. Questions of trusts or property law may also need to be determined within financial remedy proceedings.

The court has three main methods of approaching trusts within an application for a financial remedy:

•
treating trust income or assets as a resource available to either party (or declining to do so)—see: Introduction to trusts within financial proceedings — Trusts as a financial resource
•
exercising its power to vary a nuptial settlement under

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Family News

Family weekly highlights—27 March 2025

This week's edition of Family weekly highlights includes details of a new protocol on the disclosure of information between coroners and the Family Court in cases involving fatality. Analysis of a High Court decision on unlawful surrogacy arrangements is also set out, together with notable aspects of the Chancellor of the Exchequer’s Spring Statement, analysis of recent judgments on whether a Mesher order was appropriate, forced marriage protection orders and appeals made out of time. A new Practice Note on the citation of authorities in the family courts and a new flowchart on applications under Part 18 of the Family Procedure Rules 2010 are also set out.

High Court warns against unlawful surrogacy arrangements (Re Z (Unlawful Foreign Surrogacy—Adoption)

Family analysis: An unusual predicament faced a couple in this case where they sought to be recognised as the parents of two children after an unlawful foreign surrogacy. This decision brought into sharp focus the legal and ethical dilemmas that arise when intended parents embark on illegal surrogacy arrangements in a foreign country. A significant feature in this case was also that the applicants were in their sixties and had not given sufficient consideration to the impact on the children of their age. Ultimately the only orders that were appropriate in the circumstances were adoption orders which were granted by the court. Tahmina Rahman, barrister at 1|GC Family Law Chambers, considers the issues.

Disclosure of information between coroners and the Family Court in cases involving fatality

The President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, and the Chief Coroner, Her Honour Judge Alexia Durran, have published a new protocol and good practice model the— 2025 Protocol and Good Practice Model: Disclosure of information between coroners and the Family Court in cases involving fatality which takes effect from 24 March 2025 in cases involving the death of a child or adult where the circumstances of the death may be relevant to, and/or have the potential to inform, the assessment of risk concerning the subject children in family proceedings. The protocol is a guide to best practice for Family Court judges and coroners where there are parallel proceedings. It provides guidance on the flow of information between the two jurisdictions, and on dealing with requests for testing of the deceased to establish paternity. It also explains how Family Court judges and coroners can work together to seek expedited post-mortem examination evidence, in cases where care and welfare decisions for surviving children cannot be made until the cause of the deceased’s death is determined.

Family weekly highlights—20 March 2025

This week's edition of Family weekly highlights includes details of a consultation on the regulation of experts in family law children proceedings, together with the latest Family Procedure Rule Committee meeting minutes. Analysis of recent judgments on premature infant injury, the division of assets in financial remedy proceedings and coercive and controlling behaviour are also set out.