Education supervision orders

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

A local authority may commence proceedings under section 36 of the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989) where there are concerns that a child is not being properly educated. If such concerns are part of a wider picture of a child who is more generally suffering (or at risk of suffering) significant harm, attributable to a lack of reasonable parental care, or that the child is beyond parental control, it is open to the local authority to commence care or supervision proceedings. However, if the concerns are only educational, for example truancy, the usual first step will be to consider an application for an education supervision order.

See Practice Note:

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Family News

Acquiring parental responsibility under section 4(1)(a) of the Children Act 1989—non-biological fathers (KL v BA)

Family analysis: In KL v BA the court considered whether the effect of a declaration of non-parentage in respect of a man who was not married to a child's mother and was named on the child's birth certificate as the father, but whom subsequent genetic testing showed was not the child's biological father, was to render his putative acquisition of parental responsibility under section 4(1)(a) of the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989) void ab initio, or whether he had and retained parental responsibility that could only be removed by order of the court. Aimee Jones, solicitor at Sternberg Reed considers the decision.

Family weekly highlights—6 February 2025

This week's edition of Family weekly highlights includes details of guidance from the Family Justice Council for legal practitioners working with neurodivergent users of the family justice system, additional funding for the pathfinder courts pilot scheme and the extension of the family mediation voucher scheme. Recent judgments including the Court of Appeal’s decision to reverse the anonymisation of family court judges, consideration of overseas adoption and maintenance pending suit and legal service payment orders are also considered. Three new Practice Notes on financial provision for children over 18 are also set out.

Habeas corpus in Care proceedings (Care orders and the limits of habeas corpus (The Father v Worcestershire County Council)

Family analysis: The Supreme Court was concerned with the question of whether habeas corpus can be used as a remedy where children are placed in foster care via a care order and whether the making of a care order results in ‘detention’. On considering the primary legislation relating to care orders and the legislative regime which establishes the Family Court, neither contain clear words excluding habeas corpus, however the Supreme Court decided that there are other reasons why habeas corpus cannot be used to challenge a care order and highlighted the appropriate routes of appeal. Teertha Gupta KC at 4PB examines the issues.

Family court judges’ anonymisation reversed by Court of Appeal (Tickle & Summers v BBC and others)

Family analysis: The murder of ten-year-old Sara Sharif by her father and step-mother continues to dominate the UK news. Following her death, journalists (Louise Tickle and Hannah Summers) and major news organisations sought disclosure of documents and information from the historical Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989) proceedings concerning Sara and her siblings, including the relevant judges’ names. Despite the judges involved in those proceedings having made no application in respect of their own anonymity, Mr Justice Williams nonetheless included in his disclosure order a provision that their names were not to be published. The appeals against Williams J’s decision were successful on each of the three grounds advanced. He had lacked jurisdiction to order the judges’ anonymisation and there had been serious procedural irregularities owing to the lack of submissions and evidence on the anonymisation issue. The Court of Appeal also disapproved of the judge’s use of anecdotal material and his own experiences to try to shore up his judgment. Williams J was further criticised for his unfair treatment of the journalists and Channel 4. Publication of the judges’ names has now taken place in accordance with the Court of Appeal’s decision to ensure a short interval of seven days occurred during which time HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) was required to put in place any protective measures. David Wilkinson, solicitor at Slater Heelis, examines the issues.

View Family by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Interim orders in public children proceedings

Interim orders in public children proceedingsThis Practice Note sets out the requirements in relation to interim orders in public children proceedings including the criteria and nature of interim orders and the duration, effect and termination of an interim order. It also provides guidance on

Public children—emergency protection orders

Public children—emergency protection ordersThis Practice Note sets out the circumstances in which an emergency protection order (EPO) is appropriate, together with the required grounds for granting an EPO, jurisdiction, procedure and the duration and effect of an EPO. It also deals with issues such

Public children—threshold criteria

Public children—threshold criteriaThis Practice Note details the threshold criteria as set out in section 31(2) of the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989) and the public children law applications to which it applies. It sets out the definition of the threshold criteria as provided for in ChA 1989 and the

Reports under section 37 of the Children Act 1989

Reports under section 37 of the Children Act 1989Under section 37 of the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989), the court has the power to order an investigation by a local authority into the welfare of a child if it appears that a public law order, namely a supervision order or a care order, may be
Interim orders in public children proceedings

Interim orders in public children proceedings

Interim orders in public children proceedingsThis Practice Note sets out the requirements in relation to interim orders in public children proceedings including the criteria and nature of interim orders and the duration, effect and termination of an interim order. It also provides guidance on

Public children—emergency protection orders

Public children—emergency protection orders

Public children—emergency protection ordersThis Practice Note sets out the circumstances in which an emergency protection order (EPO) is appropriate, together with the required grounds for granting an EPO, jurisdiction, procedure and the duration and effect of an EPO. It also deals with issues such

Public children—threshold criteria

Public children—threshold criteria

Public children—threshold criteriaThis Practice Note details the threshold criteria as set out in section 31(2) of the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989) and the public children law applications to which it applies. It sets out the definition of the threshold criteria as provided for in ChA 1989 and the

Reports under section 37 of the Children Act 1989

Reports under section 37 of the Children Act 1989

Reports under section 37 of the Children Act 1989Under section 37 of the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989), the court has the power to order an investigation by a local authority into the welfare of a child if it appears that a public law order, namely a supervision order or a care order, may be