Fostering

Fostering

Foster care for a ‘looked after’ children

A child is looked after if:

•
they are in the local authority’s care (which includes both interim care orders and full care orders), or
•
they are accommodated by the local authority under any of its other social services functions other than certain exceptions, ie:
1. ◦
  sections 17, 23B and 24B of the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989) (in England)
2. ◦
  sections 15, 109, 114 and 115 of the Social Services and Well-being (Wales) Act 2014 (in Wales), and
3. ◦
  Social Services and Well-being (Wales) Act 2014, Pt 4 (in Wales)

There are notable differences between fostering provisions in England and in Wales.

See Practice Note: Public children—fostering.

Foster care in England

One of the most important local authority duties to accommodate children, other than through care proceedings, is the duty to provide accommodation for any child in need in its area who requires it as a result of the factors set out in ChA 1989, s 20(1). In ChA 1989, s 20 cases, before providing the accommodation,

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Family News

Family weekly highlights—6 February 2025

This week's edition of Family weekly highlights includes details of guidance from the Family Justice Council for legal practitioners working with neurodivergent users of the family justice system, additional funding for the pathfinder courts pilot scheme and the extension of the family mediation voucher scheme. Recent judgments including the Court of Appeal’s decision to reverse the anonymisation of family court judges, consideration of overseas adoption and maintenance pending suit and legal service payment orders are also considered. Three new Practice Notes on financial provision for children over 18 are also set out.

Habeas corpus in Care proceedings (Care orders and the limits of habeas corpus (The Father v Worcestershire County Council)

Family analysis: The Supreme Court was concerned with the question of whether habeas corpus can be used as a remedy where children are placed in foster care via a care order and whether the making of a care order results in ‘detention’. On considering the primary legislation relating to care orders and the legislative regime which establishes the Family Court, neither contain clear words excluding habeas corpus, however the Supreme Court decided that there are other reasons why habeas corpus cannot be used to challenge a care order and highlighted the appropriate routes of appeal. Teertha Gupta KC at 4PB examines the issues.

Family court judges’ anonymisation reversed by Court of Appeal (Tickle & Summers v BBC and others)

Family analysis: The murder of ten-year-old Sara Sharif by her father and step-mother continues to dominate the UK news. Following her death, journalists (Louise Tickle and Hannah Summers) and major news organisations sought disclosure of documents and information from the historical Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989) proceedings concerning Sara and her siblings, including the relevant judges’ names. Despite the judges involved in those proceedings having made no application in respect of their own anonymity, Mr Justice Williams nonetheless included in his disclosure order a provision that their names were not to be published. The appeals against Williams J’s decision were successful on each of the three grounds advanced. He had lacked jurisdiction to order the judges’ anonymisation and there had been serious procedural irregularities owing to the lack of submissions and evidence on the anonymisation issue. The Court of Appeal also disapproved of the judge’s use of anecdotal material and his own experiences to try to shore up his judgment. Williams J was further criticised for his unfair treatment of the journalists and Channel 4. Publication of the judges’ names has now taken place in accordance with the Court of Appeal’s decision to ensure a short interval of seven days occurred during which time HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) was required to put in place any protective measures. David Wilkinson, solicitor at Slater Heelis, examines the issues.

CTJ announces applications for High Court Judicial Assistant Scheme 2025/2026

The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary (CTJ) has announced that applications for the Judicial Assistant Scheme for the High Court of England and Wales for 2025/2026 will open on 14 February 2025. The deadline for applications is at 6pm on 21 March 2025. The scheme offers placements lasting either two or four legal terms, targeting recently qualified barristers and solicitors in the early stages of their careers. Successful applicants will be assigned to judges across all three Divisions of the High Court, assisting with legal research, document summarisation, and general judicial support. Candidates must demonstrate effective decision-making, excellent communication skills, the ability to deliver at pace, and a high level of professional integrity.