Unfair contract terms

Introducing unfair contract terms

This overview is a guide to the Lexis+® UK Financial Services content within the Unfair contract terms subtopic, with links to the appropriate materials.

Unfair terms in consumer contracts

All suppliers using standard contract terms with consumers must apply a test of fairness to terms that have not been individually negotiated subject to certain exempt terms. A standard term will be deemed 'unfair' by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) or other enforcing bodies if contrary to the requirement of good faith it creates a material imbalance in the parties' rights and obligations under the contract, to the consumer's detriment. Enforcement action will be taken against businesses on behalf of consumers generally but enforcers cannot pursue an offender on behalf of an individual consumer or seek personal redress. Enforcers can also compel a business to amend unfair terms or undertake not to continue using an unfair term.

Unfair terms in contracts

English common law generally recognises the principle of freedom to contract. There is a limited amount of legislation that interferes with this principle. Key controls do address what are considered to

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Financial Services News

FCA imposes first fine for transaction reporting failures under UK MiFIR

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has imposed its first fine under the UK Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation(Assimilated Regulation (EU) No 600/2014) (UK MiFIR) for transaction reporting failures. Infinox Capital Limited was fined £99,200 for failing to submit 46,053 transaction reports between 1 October 2022 and 31 March 2023, specifically for single-stock contracts for difference (CFD) trades executed through one of its corporate brokerage accounts. Infinox breached Article 26(1) of the UK MiFIR.

Commission adopts amendment to EU CRR RTS on call and put options mapped to commodity risk category

The European Commission has adopted Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) …/... of 28.1.2025 amending the regulatory technical standards laid down in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/931 as regards the specification of the formula for calculating the supervisory delta of call and put options mapped to the commodity risk category.

Special administrators of insolvent investment bank fail to obtain approval for a proposed litigation reserve—Re Wealthtek LLP (In special administration)

Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: The special administrators (the Administrators) of a failed investment bank were seeking approval of a distribution scheme, including a retention to cover the costs of returning assets to clients of the bank, which included a substantial sum to cover the costs of potential litigation to recover client assets from third parties. The court declined to approve the reserve: all but a very small number of the affected clients were likely to be entitled to compensation under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (the FSCS) and, where the scheme applied, the FSCS would be subrogated to the compensated clients and pursue their claims against third parties, at the FSCS’s own cost but with a right of recoupment out of any assets recovered. Mr Justice Rajah stressed the importance of the Administrators’ duty of candour to the court when seeking approval for their proposed scheme of distribution, and of their obligation to draw all relevant material to the court’s attention, particularly where it affects parties not before the court. In light of their failure to do so, elements of their costs were disallowed. Written by Bridget Williamson, barrister, at Enterprise Chambers.

ESMA publishes final report on proposed amendments to RTS on CCP colleges to align with EMIR 3

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published a final report containing draft amendments to the regulatory technical standards (RTS) on colleges for central counterparties (CCPs). These amendments align the RTS with Regulation (EU) No 2024/2987 (EMIR 3), which aims to mitigate excessive exposures to third-country CCPs and improve the efficiency of EU clearing markets.

View Financial Services by content type :

News