Recognised psychiatric illness

Published by a LexisNexis PI & Clinical Negligence expert
Practice notes

Recognised psychiatric illness

Published by a LexisNexis PI & Clinical Negligence expert

Practice notes
imgtext

The general rule—no compensation unless there is a recognised psychiatric illness

It is common for accident victims to suffer considerable distress as a result of their accident or injury, particularly if the accident itself was very serious or if a fatality occurred. Generally speaking, such distress will not entitle them to bring a claim for psychiatric injury as a separate head of loss unless that injury amounts to a recognised psychiatric illness.

As such, whether or not a claimant has suffered a recognised psychiatric injury is a particularly important issue.

There are two benefits to resolving this question quickly:

  1. firstly, it allows the claim to proceed on the correct basis and the claimant to be compensated in full, and

  2. secondly, it means that the rehabilitation code can be used to help a claimant who will benefit medically from psychological or psychiatric intervention to receive it as soon as possible

For further information on the Rehabilitation Code, see Practice Note: Rehabilitation Code 2015.

The different factual situations where a claim for psychiatric injury or illness

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
Key definition:
Distress definition
What does Distress mean?

A landlord's right to take goods as compensation for unpaid rent.

Popular documents