Accidents abroad

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

Practical tips

Various issues arise in relation to accidents abroad including:

  1. •

    can the claim be brought in England and Wales

  2. •

    do the courts of England and Wales have jurisdiction to hear and determine the claim

  3. •

    how can service of proceedings be carried out abroad

  4. •

    which country’s laws will govern the various issues in the case and how will this be determined

The first step is to determine whether the incident relates to a package holiday which is covered by the Package Travel Regulations. For the majority of package holiday claims, it is usually possible to bring a claim against a travel operator domiciled in England and Wales. However, jurisdiction is likely to be an issue in relation to non-tour operator claims and road traffic accidents.

For practical tips on dealing with cases involving claimants injured abroad, see Practice Note: Accidents abroad—a practical guide.

It is important to appreciate that special rules apply under international conventions in claims arising from international travel by train, air or sea. For further guidance, see Practice Notes: Accidents arising from rail travel, Accidents arising from air travel

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest PI & Clinical Negligence News

Court orders parties to attempt mediation (DKH Retail Ltd v City Football Group Ltd)

Dispute Resolution analysis: This decision considers an application by the claimants for the court to order the parties to mediate their dispute pursuant to the courts’ powers to do so in CPR 1.4(2)(e) and CPR 3.1(2)(o), following the leading Court of Appeal decision of Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council in which the Court of Appeal determined that courts have the power to order parties to engage in a non-court based dispute resolution process.

PI & Clinical Negligence weekly highlights—16 January 2025

This week's edition of PI & Clinical Negligence weekly highlights includes the updated set of Additional Tables to the Ogden Tables which have been published to provide multipliers at positive 0.5%. We consider a County Court decision which dismissed a claim for personal injury due to fundamental dishonesty but the claims for vehicle damage, recovery and storage and for loss of use were not dismissed. We have also included a new Practice Note which provides guidance on military noise-induced hearing loss claims. In addition, we have our usual roundup of other news, cases and New Law Journal articles of interest.

Fundamental dishonesty and the road to justice—the surprising outcome (Senay v Mulsanne Insurance Company Ltd)

PI & Clinical Negligence analysis: This was an RTA involving a mixed claim for personal injury and losses caused by negligence (directly or indirectly related to the accident). The claim succeeded on the issue of liability. Having decided that the personal injury claim was fundamentally dishonest, the court was invited to dismiss the entire claim—including claims for recovery and storage of the vehicle after the accident and damages for loss of use. The issue being the reach and effect of section 57 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 (CJCA 2015) in claims which are for personal injury as part of a larger claim. Because the judge held there was no binding authority or guidance on the point, the court conducted an analysis of the wording of the 2015 statute, by reference to Hansard, to determine the intention of the legislature. Written by Colm Nugent, barrister at Gatehouse Chambers.

Official Injury Claim publishes quarterly service data

The Official Injury Claim has published its quarterly service data for the period of 1 October to 31 December 2024. This latest release includes comprehensive statistics on various aspects of the claims process, such as claims volume, representation, types of claims, settlements and liability. Notably, the publication now features additional data on the top five reasons for calls to the Portal Support Centre, enhancing transparency and providing valuable insights into user interactions. The report also covers exceptional injuries and circumstances, claims exiting the portal, lifecycle and dormancy. This expanded dataset aims to offer a more thorough understanding of the service's operations and will continue to be issued on a quarterly basis, serving as a crucial resource for legal practitioners and stakeholders in the personal injury claims sector.

View PI & Clinical Negligence by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Psychiatric injury—establishing liability

Psychiatric injury—establishing liabilityLiability for psychiatric injury is dependent in part on the nature of the injuries suffered and the manner in which they were sustained.Classifying the victimWhere a claimant suffers both physical and psychiatric injury (even if the physical injury was very

The employer’s duty of care

The employer’s duty of careOverriding dutiesAt common law, an employer is under a duty to take reasonable care of the health and safety of its employees in all the circumstances of the case so as not to expose them to an unnecessary risk.This duty of care extends to the employee’s physical and

Claims against the police

Claims against the policeIntroductionThe police force is a pure public authority (ie performs only public functions). Therefore, claims can be brought against it under the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) and of misfeasance in public office. For further guidance, see Practice Notes: Personal injury

Is industrial deafness the new whiplash?

Personal Injury analysis: Are industrial deafness cases costing more? Christopher Briggs, associate in the serious injury division at Pannone, part of Slater & Gordon, says these cases need to be carefully vetted and lawyers need to be aware of all the potential pitfalls.
Psychiatric injury—establishing liability

Psychiatric injury—establishing liability

Psychiatric injury—establishing liabilityLiability for psychiatric injury is dependent in part on the nature of the injuries suffered and the manner in which they were sustained.Classifying the victimWhere a claimant suffers both physical and psychiatric injury (even if the physical injury was very

The employer’s duty of care

The employer’s duty of care

The employer’s duty of careOverriding dutiesAt common law, an employer is under a duty to take reasonable care of the health and safety of its employees in all the circumstances of the case so as not to expose them to an unnecessary risk.This duty of care extends to the employee’s physical and

Claims against the police

Claims against the police

Claims against the policeIntroductionThe police force is a pure public authority (ie performs only public functions). Therefore, claims can be brought against it under the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) and of misfeasance in public office. For further guidance, see Practice Notes: Personal injury

Is industrial deafness the new whiplash?

Is industrial deafness the new whiplash?

Personal Injury analysis: Are industrial deafness cases costing more? Christopher Briggs, associate in the serious injury division at Pannone, part of Slater & Gordon, says these cases need to be carefully vetted and lawyers need to be aware of all the potential pitfalls.