News 4
Q&As
Where a party in financial proceedings has completed a statement of information for a consent order in Form D81, and then discovers that they are to receive an inheritance, are they under a duty to update the Form D81? What are the implications if they are unsure of the amount they will inherit?
The ‘duty of ongoing disclosure’ continues until the court has made its order and is fundamental to the process of financial remedy proceedings. In NG v SG (Appeal: Non-Disclosure), Mostyn J put it this way (at para [1]):
‘The law of financial remedies following divorce has many commandments but the greatest of these is the absolute bounden duty imposed on the parties to give, not merely to each other, but, first and foremost to the court, full frank and clear disclosure of their present and likely future financial resources. Non-disclosure is a bane which strikes at the very integrity of the adjudicative process. Without full disclosure the court cannot render a true certain and just
To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it,
sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.
Related documents:
Practice notes 1
Q&As 7
- A financial consent order was sent to the court and refused on the basis that it was not considered...
- A man believed he was the father of a child, and was included on the child's birth certificate (prio...
- An order was made by consent in financial remedy proceedings in 1995. The parties now wish the court...
- Can a non-biological father be liable to pay child maintenance to the biological mother either by vi...
- Can the court make a child arrangements order (CAO) when the parents are still living together in th...
- If a consent order includes provision for child maintenance in financial remedy proceedings, but no...
- If an individual has an interest in a business, how should this be set out when providing disclosure...