Particulars of claim—food poisoning claim under the Package Travel and Linked Travel Arrangements Regulations 2018

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
Produced in partnership with Andrew Wilson
Precedents

Particulars of claim—food poisoning claim under the Package Travel and Linked Travel Arrangements Regulations 2018

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

Produced in partnership with Andrew Wilson

Precedents
imgtext
IN THE COUNTY COURT AT [insert]Claim No. [insert number]

Parties

  1. (1)

    A

  1. (2)

    B        Claimants

  1. -and-

  1. C        Defendant

______________________

Particulars of claim

______________________

    1. 1

      At all material times the Defendant carried on business as a tour operator supplying package holidays to travellers.

    1. 2

      On 2 July 2018 the First Claimant visited the website of the Defendant where she entered into an agreement to purchase a package holiday in Greece with the Defendant. The agreement was for the First Claimant and her husband, the Second Claimant, to fly from East Midlands Airport to Athens on 8 August 2018, from where they were to transfer onwards to Santorini. The contract then provided for the First Claimant and Second Claimant to fly from Santorini to Athens and onwards to East Midlands Airport on 15 August 2018. After the Completion of the agreement for flights, the Claimants’ names and the First Claimant’s payment details and email address were supplied by the Defendant to D Hotels Ltd via a website link. The First Claimant then booked from the website of D Hotels Ltd a seven night stay at the Athena Hotel

Andrew Wilson
Andrew Wilson

Consultant Solicitor

Andrew has more than 25 years’ experience of working in the fields of personal injury and occupational disease litigation, acting for both claimants and defendants. He trained at L Bingham & Co, gaining early experience in a number of important high profile claims involving the MIB. During the 1990s Andrew worked at Hextalls and then Kennedys, predominantly for defendants across a range of motor, employers’ liability and public liability matters many of which involved serious injuries or death. More recently, he has dealt with cases for claimants who have suffered serious injuries or occupational disease. He was a partner in a large specialist practice. He has provided seminars to solicitors and other legal professionals both for an external conference company and in house on the workings of the Civil Procedure Rules in the context of personal injury claims, amongst other subjects.

He has now set up his own legal consultancy, providing advice and support to solicitors, particularly a specialist London practice, in connection with fatal accidents and very serious injury cases such as brain injury, mostly in the High Court. He has continued to develop his education and training activities, providing seminars and contributing articles and commentaries to legal information services.

Since his training, Andrew has retained a particular interest in issues of motor indemnity and the operation of the Road Traffic Act and Article 75.

Read moreRead more
Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
Related legal acts:
Key definition:
Particulars of claim definition
What does Particulars of claim mean?

The statement of case in which the claimant sets out the facts he relies on to establish a cause of action against the defendant.

Read more readmore

Popular documents

Accidents abroad—a practical guide

Accidents abroad—a practical guideSTOP PRESS—Impact of the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023: This document contains references to retained EU law (REUL) and associated terms introduced by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 in connection with Brexit. From 1 January 2024, REUL

Psychiatric injury—establishing liability

Psychiatric injury—establishing liabilityLiability for psychiatric injury is dependent in part on the nature of the injuries suffered and the manner in which they were sustained.Classifying the victimWhere a claimant suffers both physical and psychiatric injury (even if the physical injury was very

The employer’s duty of care

The employer’s duty of careOverriding dutiesAt common law, an employer is under a duty to take reasonable care of the health and safety of its employees in all the circumstances of the case so as not to expose them to an unnecessary risk.This duty of care extends to the employee’s physical and

Limitation in noise-induced hearing loss claims

Limitation in noise-induced hearing loss claimsLimitation is almost always an issue in noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) claims.The typical claimant is someone who was exposed to noise at work much more than three years before they approached a solicitor enquiring about a claim. They are therefore