Bankruptcy

Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis

Bankruptcy is an insolvency process for individuals, which commences on the day the bankruptcy order is made.

As per Lord Justice David Richards in Azuonye v Kent (in her capacity as trustee of the bankrupt estate of the appellant) [2019] EWCA Civ 1289, [2019] All ER (D) 123 (Jul) at para [8]:

In the very broadest of terms, the purpose of bankruptcy is to provide protection to the bankrupt against the claims of creditors in respect of debts and liabilities as at the commencement of the bankruptcy and to realise the property owned by the bankrupt as at that date and distribute the realised proceeds among those creditors.

Until 6 April 2016, unlike its corporate equivalent liquidation, only the court could make an individual bankrupt. However, on 6 April 2016, the new bankruptcy applications regime came into force replacing debtors' bankruptcy petitions (but not creditors' petitions), meaning that any individual who wishes to be made bankrupt must make a bankruptcy application which is determined by an adjudicator, and not by the court.

The making of a bankruptcy order—whether by the court or by the adjudicator—will free the

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Restructuring & Insolvency News

Restructuring & Insolvency weekly highlights—5 February 2026

This week's edition of Restructuring & Insolvency weekly highlights includes: an examination of an application to invalidate an administration appointment under a qualifying floating charge (Perhar v Synergy), a discussion on costs of a creditor’s failed objection to restructuring plans (Re Madagascar Oil Ltd), plus a round-up of other news and cases for restructuring and insolvency professionals.

Insolvency Service reports winding up of three unregistered trust and company service providers

The Insolvency Service has reported that three connected companies providing company secretarial and registration services have been wound up in the public interest following High Court proceedings on 29 January 2026. Yunma Tianlong International Consulting Co, Limited, Busy Secretary Service Limited and J&C Business (UK) Co, Limited provided services to more than 11,000 UK businesses on behalf of overseas clients, predominantly based in China. The companies failed to register with HM Revenue and Customs as trust and company service providers (TCSPs) and operated outside the UK’s anti-money laundering regulations. They also failed to conduct appropriate background and due diligence checks on clients and created false impressions of a genuine UK business presence. The Official Receiver has been appointed liquidator of all three companies, and Companies House has taken enforcement action against more than half of their client companies.

Fossil secures court approval for innovative UK restructuring plan (Re Fossil (UK) Global Services Ltd)

Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: The High Court sanctioned the restructuring plan of Fossil (UK) Global Services Ltd under Part 26A of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) (the ‘Plan’), following near‑unanimous approval (99.99% by value) from a single class of noteholders, comprising both retail and wholesale creditors. Mr Justice Richards applied the four‑stage test set out by Lord Justice Snowden in Re AGPS Bondco Plc (‘Adler’): (i) whether the statutory requirements were satisfied, (ii) whether the class was fairly represented and voted bona fide in the interests of the class, (iii) whether the plan was fair and could reasonably have been approved (the so‑called ‘limited rationality test’), and (iv) whether any legal ‘blot’ or defect existed. The court placed particular emphasis on the quality and accessibility of information provided to retail creditors, noting that the involvement of an independent Retail Advocate helped ensure that they were properly informed and adequately represented throughout the process. Concerns regarding the participation rights of ‘New‑Money’ providers and the appropriateness of a single class were considered and rejected, with the judge satisfied that all creditors were better off under the Plan than under the relevant alternative. No defects were identified, and expert evidence supported the conclusion that the Plan would likely be recognised in the US, thereby ensuring its cross‑border effectiveness. Written by Brian Rostron, associate at Addleshaw Goddard LLP.

Insolvency Service announces 12-year director disqualification for breach of existing ban

The Insolvency Service has announced the 12-year directorship disqualification of Neil Aldridge, until February 2038, after he breached an existing disqualification order. Aldridge was initially banned for three and a half years in 2019 when his company, Neil Aldridge Landscapes Ltd, went into liquidation owing £82,650 to HMRC. During the disqualification, Neil acted as a director of Aldridge Landscaping Limited without permission. That company was later wound up owing a further £217,498 in unpaid tax. The Insolvency Service said the ban forms part of its work to protect creditors, taxpayers and compliant businesses. The Insolvency Service has described the case as an example of ‘abusive phoenixism’, whereby directors use new companies to evade debts from previous entities.

View Restructuring & Insolvency by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

The effect of a bankruptcy order on an individual voluntary arrangement (IVA), its assets, and the

The effect of a bankruptcy order on an individual voluntary arrangement (IVA), its assets, and the creditorsThe gap in the insolvency legislationIt is a striking gap in the drafting of the insolvency legislation that the effects of the making of a bankruptcy order on an individual voluntary

Bankruptcy petitions—process and procedure

Bankruptcy petitions—process and procedure post-presentation of the petitionBefore the hearing of the creditors’ bankruptcy petition takes place, there are a number of steps that must be taken to comply with the procedural requirements set out in the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016 (IR

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companiesWhy does it matter?A company that is a member of a group and has incurred any of the types of losses available for surrender by way of group relief may, without any further rules, have more than one way in which to use the loss. There are a

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the current registered owner? Or does the informal exoneration only apply to the parties to the document which informally exonerated the rentcharge?This Q&A considers the situation where, at some
The effect of a bankruptcy order on an individual voluntary arrangement (IVA), its assets, and the

The effect of a bankruptcy order on an individual voluntary arrangement (IVA), its assets, and the

The effect of a bankruptcy order on an individual voluntary arrangement (IVA), its assets, and the creditorsThe gap in the insolvency legislationIt is a striking gap in the drafting of the insolvency legislation that the effects of the making of a bankruptcy order on an individual voluntary

Bankruptcy petitions—process and procedure

Bankruptcy petitions—process and procedure

Bankruptcy petitions—process and procedure post-presentation of the petitionBefore the hearing of the creditors’ bankruptcy petition takes place, there are a number of steps that must be taken to comply with the procedural requirements set out in the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016 (IR

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companies

Priority between loss reliefs in loss making companiesWhy does it matter?A company that is a member of a group and has incurred any of the types of losses available for surrender by way of group relief may, without any further rules, have more than one way in which to use the loss. There are a

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the

If a rentcharge is shown as being informally exonerated on title information, does this apply to the current registered owner? Or does the informal exoneration only apply to the parties to the document which informally exonerated the rentcharge?This Q&A considers the situation where, at some