Bankruptcy restrictions orders and undertakings

Copyright © 2024 LexisNexis

What is a bankruptcy restrictions order (BRO) and a bankruptcy restrictions undertaking (BRU)?

In the spirit of encouraging free enterprise, the Enterprise Act 2002 (EnA 2002) inserted a new section and schedule into the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) (IA 1986, s 281A and Sch 4A), so that with effect from 1 April 2004, a bankrupt is (usually) be discharged from bankruptcy on the first anniversary of the making of the bankruptcy order, unless misconduct is found. Previously, the period was three years. On discharge from bankruptcy, the disqualifications and restrictions which apply to an undischarged bankrupt cease.

While this reduction may genuinely assist bankrupts who through no fault of their own found themselves bankrupt and are unlikely to repeat the process, it has the consequent effect that bankrupts who were complicit in their own downfall are also able to release themselves from debt after only one year rather than three, and can go on to obtain credit and act free of any restrictions, possibly to continue the previous misconduct.

To counteract the reduction in the period of bankruptcy,

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Restructuring & Insolvency News

Presentation of winding up petition prevented by lender’s potential misrepresentation (Alpha Schools (Holdings) Ltd v Signal Alpha III Fund LP)

Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: This was an application for an injunction to restrain presentation of a winding up petition. The respondent was a company which asserted that it was entitled, pursuant to a term sheet prepared during loan negotiations, to a £350,000 break fee and certain other sums. The applicant’s main argument was that it had a cross-claim in misrepresentation which meant that (1) the term sheet, to the extent that it had contractual force, had been rescinded and (2) there was in any event a damages claim large enough to extinguish the alleged debt. It was held that there was sufficient evidence of misrepresentation to meet the test. The applicant was entitled to an injunction. Written by Nora Wannagat, barrister at Tanfield Chambers.

Restructuring & Insolvency weekly highlights—19 December 2024

This week's edition of Restructuring & Insolvency weekly highlights includes: the publication by the Insolvency Service of its monthly insolvency statistics for November 2024, an examination of the meaning of ‘unregistered company’ under section 220(1) of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) (East Riding of Yorkshire Council v KMG), analysis of the Commercial Court’s guidance on pleading and proving claims under IA 1986, s 423 (Invest Bank PSC v El-Husseini), plus a round-up of other news and cases for restructuring and insolvency professionals.

Challenge to administrators’ conduct dismissed (Re CJFL Property Partners Ltd; Nardelli v Richardson)

Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: The court dismissed the applicants’ applications to remove and replace the joint administrators. The administrators’ decisions fell within the range of decisions that were open to them, even though further renegotiations with the secured creditor (Desiman) and the purchaser’s ‘chipping’ at the purchase price during turbulent economic conditions eroded the prospect the applicants would receive an economic return in the administration. In that respect, Desiman could be said to have driven a hard commercial bargain, but that was not a circumstance for which the administrators were ultimately responsible. Nor was it sufficient for any of the allegations to be made out. Written by Samuel Parsons, barrister at Erskine Chambers.

Court of Appeal clarifies when a dissolved partnership may bring litigation (Flohr v Frontiers Capital I Ltd Partnership)

Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: The Court of Appeal has confirmed that the authority to bind a firm for the purposes of its winding up (conferred on partners after the dissolution of a partnership by section 38 of the Partnership Act 1890 (PA 1890)) applies to pursuing causes of action which accrued prior to dissolution. Whether PA 1890, s 38 will permit partners of a dissolved partnership to pursue litigation post-dissolution is a fact sensitive question. The question is whether such litigation is reasonably required in all the circumstances to wind up the affairs of the partnership. Relevant considerations are not circumscribed and will include considerations of prospects of success and cost-effectiveness. In Flohr, the Court of Appeal confirmed a general partner of a limited partnership governed by the Limited Partnership Act 1907 (LPA 1907) was empowered to sue a third party on behalf of the partnership notwithstanding the dissolution and winding up of the partnership. This was so even though the relevant cause of action arose prior to dissolution. Written by James Fagan, Barrister, at Radcliffe Chambers.

View Restructuring & Insolvency by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Debt relief orders (DROs)

Debt relief orders (DROs)What is a DRO?DROs are 'a new and simplified way of wiping the slate clean for debtors who are too poor to go bankrupt'.A DRO is made in respect of qualifying debts.A qualifying debt means a debt which is:•for a liquidated sum payable either immediately or at some future

What assets vest in the trustee in bankruptcy and what steps does the official receiver or trustee in

What assets vest in the trustee in bankruptcy and what steps does the official receiver or trustee in bankruptcy need to take?Definition of property and some general principlesProperty is defined very widely in section 436 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986), and includes 'money, goods, things in

Bankruptcy petitions—process and procedure

Bankruptcy petitions—process and procedureBefore the hearing of the creditors’ bankruptcy petition takes place, there are a number of steps that must be taken to comply with the procedural requirements set out in the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016 (IR 2016), SI 2016/1024 and Practice

How to effect service of a creditor's bankruptcy petition on the debtor and what happens if service

How to effect service of a creditor's bankruptcy petition on the debtor and what happens if service cannot be effectedOnce a bankruptcy petition and supporting documents have been presented (or issued) at court, the first step the petitioning creditor will need to take is to effect service of the
Debt relief orders (DROs)

Debt relief orders (DROs)

Debt relief orders (DROs)What is a DRO?DROs are 'a new and simplified way of wiping the slate clean for debtors who are too poor to go bankrupt'.A DRO is made in respect of qualifying debts.A qualifying debt means a debt which is:•for a liquidated sum payable either immediately or at some future

What assets vest in the trustee in bankruptcy and what steps does the official receiver or trustee in

What assets vest in the trustee in bankruptcy and what steps does the official receiver or trustee in

What assets vest in the trustee in bankruptcy and what steps does the official receiver or trustee in bankruptcy need to take?Definition of property and some general principlesProperty is defined very widely in section 436 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986), and includes 'money, goods, things in

Bankruptcy petitions—process and procedure

Bankruptcy petitions—process and procedure

Bankruptcy petitions—process and procedureBefore the hearing of the creditors’ bankruptcy petition takes place, there are a number of steps that must be taken to comply with the procedural requirements set out in the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016 (IR 2016), SI 2016/1024 and Practice

How to effect service of a creditor's bankruptcy petition on the debtor and what happens if service

How to effect service of a creditor's bankruptcy petition on the debtor and what happens if service

How to effect service of a creditor's bankruptcy petition on the debtor and what happens if service cannot be effectedOnce a bankruptcy petition and supporting documents have been presented (or issued) at court, the first step the petitioning creditor will need to take is to effect service of the