PAYE and the apprenticeship levy

The Pay As You Earn (PAYE) system is the means by which an employer or pension provider makes certain statutory deductions from an employee’s or pensioner’s income. These include deductions for the employee’s (or pensioner's) liability to income tax and National Insurance contributions (NICs), as well as other earnings-based deductions such as student loan repayments.

PAYE is effectively HMRC’s method for collecting income tax from an individual on a regular basis rather than relying on every individual having to complete a tax return in order to notify HMRC of their liability. PAYE is not an exact measurement of an employee’s tax liability; rather it is an estimate of the tax that the employee should pay based on HMRC’s understanding of the income and benefits that they will receive. The tax is calculated based on notices of coding which HMRC supplies to employers and pension providers.

The PAYE system is also the method through which the apprenticeship levy is paid.

Scope of PAYE

The PAYE regime requires tax to be deducted from relevant payments by employers to employees.

For PAYE purposes, the terms employer and employee

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Tax News

Tax weekly highlights—20 February 2025

This week's edition of Tax weekly highlights includes: (1) HMRC’s confirmation that it will amend its guidance on the application of condition C of the LLP salaried member rules, (2) the Court of Appeal’s decision in A Taxpayer v HMRC as to exceptional circumstances under the statutory residence test and (3) confirmation that the Finance Bill is due to have its Report Stage and Third Reading on Monday 3 March 2025.

Court of Appeal upholds FTT exceptional circumstances exemption decision (A Taxpayer v The Commissioners for HMRC)

Private Client analysis: On 13 February 2025, the Court of Appeal handed down a judgment in A Taxpayer v The Commissioners for HMRC, an appeal against the Upper Tribunal's decision of 28 July 2023 which concerned the interpretation of the exceptional circumstances exemption (paragraph 22(4) of Schedule 45 Part 1 to the Finance Act 2013(‘para 22(4)’)) in the statutory residence test. The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and restored the FTT decision, holding that the taxpayer could rely on the exceptional circumstances exemption and was not tax resident in the UK as a result in the relevant tax year. The Upper Tribunal's decision had significantly narrowed the extent to which circumstances might be treated as exceptional for the purposes of the exemption. By overturning it, the Court of Appeal has given taxpayers clarity on their position under the statutory residence test in the event that they are prevented from leaving the UK due to exceptional circumstances. Written by Carol Katz, partner, knowledge lawyer at Mishcon de Reya LLP.

FTT restricts scope of employee taxpayer information notice in disguised remuneration case (Binoy Joseph v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In Binoy Joseph v HMRC, the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) restricted the details which the taxpayer was obliged to provide to HMRC under an information notice. Some personal information could be redacted, and details of employment arrangements and supply chain were simplified.

High Court considers definition of a bar for VAT purposes (R (oao Anglia Ruskin Students’ Union) v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In R (oao Anglia Ruskin Students’ Union) v HMRC, the High Court refused the Claimant, Anglia Ruskin Students’ Union, permission to apply for judicial review of a decision by HMRC that catering supplies made from the Union’s establishment were subject to VAT as the establishment was a bar and therefore unable to benefit from the carve out contained within an extra-statutory concession. The Court found that the premises in question met the definition of being a bar as the word ‘bar’ is ordinarily used.