Salary sacrifice (optional remuneration arrangements)

What is a salary sacrifice arrangement?

Following implementation of the Finance Act 2017 (FA 2017), from 6 April 2017, only salary sacrifice arrangements relating to contributions to registered pension arrangements, pensions advice, employer-supported childcare, cycle to work and ultra-low emission cars continue to benefit from beneficial tax and/or National Insurance contribution (NIC) arrangements. Therefore, unless the salary sacrifice relates to one of these special cases (or relates to an otherwise tax-exempt benefit) swapping salary for benefits under a salary sacrifice scheme will, subject to transitional arrangements, face a taxable value of the higher of the amount of cash remuneration given up, and the taxable value under the benefit in kind rules.

The rules introduced by FA 2017 refer to ‘optional remuneration’ arrangements (OpRA). These are wider than the traditional salary sacrifice arrangements outlined above, and include any future arrangements where employees agree to be provided with a benefit rather than the salary equivalent. Broadly speaking, where an employee has an option to receive cash or benefits, the new rules may be in point. For more details, see Practice Notes: Optional remuneration arrangements and

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Tax News

FTT holds that sales of occupation income provisions applied to capital sum received by the taxpayer (Rupert Grint v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In Rupert Grint v HMRC, the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) found that the sales of occupation income anti-avoidance rules applied to a capital sum received by the taxpayer on the incorporation of his business. The anti-avoidance provisions were engaged as, although there were commercial reasons for the incorporation, one of the main objects of the arrangements was the avoidance or a reduction in income tax. The FTT also held that the closure notice was validly issued despite referring to the wrong legislative provision.

FTT holds discrimination settlement payment not taxable (L v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In L v HMRC, the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) held that the part of a settlement payment which related to a discrimination claim fell outside the scope of income tax. This was on the basis that the payment was not ‘from employment’; instead it was made because the discrimination had deprived the former employee of the opportunity to perform her full role, causing financial loss.

FTT allows taxpayer’s R&D appeal (Stage One Creative Services Ltd v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In Stage One Creative Services Ltd v HMRC, the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) allowed the taxpayer’s appeal, holding that it was entitled to research and development (R&D) relief under the pre-1 April 2024 regime for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

UT considers taxpayer’s application for permanent anonymity and third party disclosure request (HMRC v The Taxpayer and Others)

Tax analysis: The Upper Tribunal (UT) rejected a taxpayer’s application for permanent anonymity, following the taxpayer's decision to withdraw their substantive appeal with the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT). The UT further granted a third party limited access to the FTT’s previous case management decision. The UT’s decision emphasises the importance placed on open justice and highlights the court and tribunals’ reluctance to permit anonymity in litigation. Written by Helen McGhee, Partner, and Megan Durnford, Associate, at Joseph Hage Aaronson LLP.