The pensions tax regime

The pensions tax regime—overview

Pension savings under registered pension schemes are subject to favourable tax treatment, thus incentivising individuals to save for their retirement and be less reliant on the state pension system. However, the extent to which pension savings attract tax relief is subject to limits imposed by Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (HMRC).

Tax considerations are relevant to a UK registered pension scheme when:

•
funds are paid into the scheme (in the form of member and employer contributions)
•
funds/assets, including returns made from investing such funds/assets, are held in the scheme, and
•
monies are paid out of the scheme (in the form of pension benefits)

The current pensions tax relief system can broadly be described as 'Exempt-Exempt-Taxed', whereby the first two above stages are exempt from tax (subject to limits) and the third stage is taxed.

For an introduction to the current pensions tax relief system, see Practice Note: Tax treatment of pensions—an introduction.

The A-day tax regime

The Finance Act 2004 and A-day

The tax regime applicable to pensions changed significantly on 6 April 2006 when the Finance Act 2004

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Tax News

FTT holds that sales of occupation income provisions applied to capital sum received by the taxpayer (Rupert Grint v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In Rupert Grint v HMRC, the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) found that the sales of occupation income anti-avoidance rules applied to a capital sum received by the taxpayer on the incorporation of his business. The anti-avoidance provisions were engaged as, although there were commercial reasons for the incorporation, one of the main objects of the arrangements was the avoidance or a reduction in income tax. The FTT also held that the closure notice was validly issued despite referring to the wrong legislative provision.

FTT holds discrimination settlement payment not taxable (L v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In L v HMRC, the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) held that the part of a settlement payment which related to a discrimination claim fell outside the scope of income tax. This was on the basis that the payment was not ‘from employment’; instead it was made because the discrimination had deprived the former employee of the opportunity to perform her full role, causing financial loss.

FTT allows taxpayer’s R&D appeal (Stage One Creative Services Ltd v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In Stage One Creative Services Ltd v HMRC, the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) allowed the taxpayer’s appeal, holding that it was entitled to research and development (R&D) relief under the pre-1 April 2024 regime for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

UT considers taxpayer’s application for permanent anonymity and third party disclosure request (HMRC v The Taxpayer and Others)

Tax analysis: The Upper Tribunal (UT) rejected a taxpayer’s application for permanent anonymity, following the taxpayer's decision to withdraw their substantive appeal with the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT). The UT further granted a third party limited access to the FTT’s previous case management decision. The UT’s decision emphasises the importance placed on open justice and highlights the court and tribunals’ reluctance to permit anonymity in litigation. Written by Helen McGhee, Partner, and Megan Durnford, Associate, at Joseph Hage Aaronson LLP.