Brexit and assimilated law

Copyright © 2024 LexisNexis

The UK’s departure from the EU has wide ranging implications for Dispute Resolution practitioners. The UK domestic legal landscape continues to change and the content is continually reviewed and updated accordingly.

Tools

When considering issues arising out of the UK leaving the EU, it can be difficult to keep up to date or track all the consequences. The following tools provide assistance with this:

  1. •

    Practice Note: Dispute Resolution News Analysis—Brexit

  2. •

    Practice Note: Brexit—dispute resolution—Q&As which contains Q&As covering a range of issues concerning the implications of the UK’s departure from the EU

  3. •

    Practice Note: The status of EU law in the UK after Brexit [Archived]

Assimilated law

The European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018, in connection with Brexit, introduced retained EU law (REUL) and associated terms. From 1 January 2024, REUL that remains in force is known as ‘assimilated law’, in accordance with section 5 of the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023 (REUL(RR)A 2023) and is generally to be interpreted according to ordinary domestic law and principles. REUL(RR)A 2023 also introduces new tests

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Dispute Resolution News

Minutes of the CPR Committee meeting—1 November 2024

The minutes of the CPR Committee (CPRC) meeting of 1 November 2024 (conducted in a hybrid format at The Rolls Building (Royal Courts of Justice) and via video conference) cover a number of issues including the Law Commission consultation on the law of contempt, Closed Material Procedure, Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation, the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024, the outcome of the Workplace Claims consultation and costs budgeting light.

Online Procedure Rule Committee minutes—2024 in review

The Online Procedure Rule Committee (OPRC), established under the Judicial Review and Courts Act 2022 (JRACA 2022), creates rules governing the practice and procedure for specific types of online court and tribunal proceedings across the Civil, Family and Tribunal jurisdictions (CFT). The OPRC holds regular meetings, for which the minutes are published. This News Analysis summarises the key developments in 2024 and looks forward to potential future developments.

Dispute Resolution weekly highlights—19 December 2024

This week's edition of Dispute Resolution weekly highlights includes the Online Procedure Rule Committee’s minutes for 2024, the Minutes of the Civil Procedure Rule Committee of 1 November 2024 and the Court of Appeal decision in Bangs v FM Conway Ltd (relief from sanctions); dates for your diary; details of our most recently published content; and other information of general interest to dispute resolution practitioners.

MoJ publishes results from the Legal Problem and Resolution Survey 2023

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has published the results of the Legal Problem and Resolution Survey 2023, a comprehensive study involving 10,323 adults in England and Wales. The survey provides insights into the prevalence and nature of civil, administrative and family legal problems experienced by adults. It examines problem characteristics, outcomes, and the demographics of those affected. Additionally, the findings cover perceptions of online services and video-hearings in legal contexts. This data offers information for legal practitioners and policymakers on current trends in legal problem-solving and access to justice in England and Wales.

View Dispute Resolution by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Forum non conveniens—principles

Forum non conveniens—principlesThis Practice Note considers the doctrine of forum non conveniens, also referred to as the appropriate forum or the proper place for a dispute to be determined. This doctrine is of relevance when determining whether the courts of England and Wales have jurisdiction to

Anti-suit injunctions—principles

Anti-suit injunctions—principlesThis Practice Note considers anti-suit injunctions, a form of injunction used to restrain a party from either commencing or continuing proceedings in a foreign court. It explains what an anti-suit injunction is and the power of the courts to grant such an injunction.

Cross-border enforcement—CJJA 1982 and submission to the foreign court's jurisdiction

Cross-border enforcement—CJJA 1982 and submission to the foreign court's jurisdictionThis Practice Note considers the position under the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 (CJJA 1982) where enforcement proceedings for a foreign judgment are brought in the courts of England and Wales and there

Enforcement of judgments under Brussels I (recast)

Enforcement of judgments under Brussels I (recast)This Practice Note provides guidance when seeking to enforce a judgment in the courts of England and Wales under the enforcement provisions in Regulation (EU) 1215/2012, Brussels I (recast).  Such enforcement can be sought after IP completion day (31
Forum non conveniens—principles

Forum non conveniens—principles

Forum non conveniens—principlesThis Practice Note considers the doctrine of forum non conveniens, also referred to as the appropriate forum or the proper place for a dispute to be determined. This doctrine is of relevance when determining whether the courts of England and Wales have jurisdiction to

Anti-suit injunctions—principles

Anti-suit injunctions—principles

Anti-suit injunctions—principlesThis Practice Note considers anti-suit injunctions, a form of injunction used to restrain a party from either commencing or continuing proceedings in a foreign court. It explains what an anti-suit injunction is and the power of the courts to grant such an injunction.

Cross-border enforcement—CJJA 1982 and submission to the foreign court's jurisdiction

Cross-border enforcement—CJJA 1982 and submission to the foreign court's jurisdiction

Cross-border enforcement—CJJA 1982 and submission to the foreign court's jurisdictionThis Practice Note considers the position under the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 (CJJA 1982) where enforcement proceedings for a foreign judgment are brought in the courts of England and Wales and there

Enforcement of judgments under Brussels I (recast)

Enforcement of judgments under Brussels I (recast)

Enforcement of judgments under Brussels I (recast)This Practice Note provides guidance when seeking to enforce a judgment in the courts of England and Wales under the enforcement provisions in Regulation (EU) 1215/2012, Brussels I (recast).  Such enforcement can be sought after IP completion day (31