Cross-border ADR

Copyright © 2024 LexisNexis

This Overview considers cross-border alternative dispute resolution (ADR). ADR provides a confidential dispute resolution mechanism outside of a court of law, by which a dispute or difference is submitted to an impartial individual(s), either for determination or to assist the parties in reaching a negotiated resolution of their dispute.

ADR is only one consideration when dealing with a cross border dispute. For an insight into the various considerations, see: Cross border considerations—checklist.

Tools

  1. •

    understanding the different types of ADR—there are numerous alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms which may be of assistance, eg negotiation, conciliation and arbitration. For an understanding of the different forms and insight into how these differ from litigation, see Practice Note: What is ADR?

  2. •

    guide to cross-border ADR—when dealing with cross border proceedings, such disputes are generally resolved by means of litigation of arbitration. However, it may be appropriate to consider the appropriateness of ADR mechanisms. For guidance, see Practice Note: Cross-border ADR—a guide for dispute resolution

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Dispute Resolution News

Minutes of the CPR Committee meeting—1 November 2024

The minutes of the CPR Committee (CPRC) meeting of 1 November 2024 (conducted in a hybrid format at The Rolls Building (Royal Courts of Justice) and via video conference) cover a number of issues including the Law Commission consultation on the law of contempt, Closed Material Procedure, Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation, the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024, the outcome of the Workplace Claims consultation and costs budgeting light.

Online Procedure Rule Committee minutes—2024 in review

The Online Procedure Rule Committee (OPRC), established under the Judicial Review and Courts Act 2022 (JRACA 2022), creates rules governing the practice and procedure for specific types of online court and tribunal proceedings across the Civil, Family and Tribunal jurisdictions (CFT). The OPRC holds regular meetings, for which the minutes are published. This News Analysis summarises the key developments in 2024 and looks forward to potential future developments.

Dispute Resolution weekly highlights—19 December 2024

This week's edition of Dispute Resolution weekly highlights includes the Online Procedure Rule Committee’s minutes for 2024, the Minutes of the Civil Procedure Rule Committee of 1 November 2024 and the Court of Appeal decision in Bangs v FM Conway Ltd (relief from sanctions); dates for your diary; details of our most recently published content; and other information of general interest to dispute resolution practitioners.

MoJ publishes results from the Legal Problem and Resolution Survey 2023

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has published the results of the Legal Problem and Resolution Survey 2023, a comprehensive study involving 10,323 adults in England and Wales. The survey provides insights into the prevalence and nature of civil, administrative and family legal problems experienced by adults. It examines problem characteristics, outcomes, and the demographics of those affected. Additionally, the findings cover perceptions of online services and video-hearings in legal contexts. This data offers information for legal practitioners and policymakers on current trends in legal problem-solving and access to justice in England and Wales.

View Dispute Resolution by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Anti-suit injunctions—principles

Anti-suit injunctions—principlesThis Practice Note considers anti-suit injunctions, a form of injunction used to restrain a party from either commencing or continuing proceedings in a foreign court. It explains what an anti-suit injunction is and the power of the courts to grant such an injunction.

Cross-border enforcement—CJJA 1982 and submission to the foreign court's jurisdiction

Cross-border enforcement—CJJA 1982 and submission to the foreign court's jurisdictionThis Practice Note considers the position under the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 (CJJA 1982) where enforcement proceedings for a foreign judgment are brought in the courts of England and Wales and there

Enforcement of judgments under Brussels I (recast)

Enforcement of judgments under Brussels I (recast)This Practice Note provides guidance when seeking to enforce a judgment in the courts of England and Wales under the enforcement provisions in Regulation (EU) 1215/2012, Brussels I (recast).  Such enforcement can be sought after IP completion day (31

Rome I—parties fail to choose the applicable law

Rome I—parties fail to choose the applicable lawThis Practice Note considers the application of Regulation (EC) 593/2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations, commonly known as Rome I, to circumstances in which the parties have not chosen the applicable law. It considers the law
Anti-suit injunctions—principles

Anti-suit injunctions—principles

Anti-suit injunctions—principlesThis Practice Note considers anti-suit injunctions, a form of injunction used to restrain a party from either commencing or continuing proceedings in a foreign court. It explains what an anti-suit injunction is and the power of the courts to grant such an injunction.

Cross-border enforcement—CJJA 1982 and submission to the foreign court's jurisdiction

Cross-border enforcement—CJJA 1982 and submission to the foreign court's jurisdiction

Cross-border enforcement—CJJA 1982 and submission to the foreign court's jurisdictionThis Practice Note considers the position under the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 (CJJA 1982) where enforcement proceedings for a foreign judgment are brought in the courts of England and Wales and there

Enforcement of judgments under Brussels I (recast)

Enforcement of judgments under Brussels I (recast)

Enforcement of judgments under Brussels I (recast)This Practice Note provides guidance when seeking to enforce a judgment in the courts of England and Wales under the enforcement provisions in Regulation (EU) 1215/2012, Brussels I (recast).  Such enforcement can be sought after IP completion day (31

Rome I—parties fail to choose the applicable law

Rome I—parties fail to choose the applicable law

Rome I—parties fail to choose the applicable lawThis Practice Note considers the application of Regulation (EC) 593/2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations, commonly known as Rome I, to circumstances in which the parties have not chosen the applicable law. It considers the law