Cross-border disclosure and evidence

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis

When dealing with cross-border disputes, various issues arise involving disclosure and evidence may arise. For insights into other considerations, see: Cross border considerations—checklist.

Cross-border disclosure

When dealing with disclosure in cross-border disputes, a wide range of considerations arise. These include managing a foreign client’s expectation, the impact, if any, of local laws in the jurisdiction in which the documents are located, data protection considerations, the control of documents outside England and Wales, disclosure requirements in relation to foreign language documents, including whether there is an obligation to provide translations, and whether privilege attaches to the documents and their translations. For insight, see Practice Note: Cross-border evidence and disclosure—a guide for dispute resolution practitioners

Informal/formal regimes for taking evidence

When dealing with civil and commercial disputes, there may be times when it is necessary to obtain evidence located in another country. Such evidence may be in many forms, eg witness deposition (party or non party), documents (provision of or inspection), inspection of property (real or personal) or obtaining biospecimens (eg blood samples).

In many cases, such evidence will be provided on an informal basis following

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Existing user? Sign-in TAKE A FREE TRIAL
Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Dispute Resolution News

Council establishes a compelling need for an injunction against Persons Unknown to prevent trespass and nuisance (The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Enfield v Snell and others)

Local Government analysis: This case involved the London Borough of Enfield (the Council) and several defendants, including individuals living on boats on the River Lea and separate structures on the embankment owned by the Council. The land in question is part of the Meridian Water Regeneration Project (‘Regeneration Project), a significant development initiative aimed at constructing approximately 10,000 residential homes, commercial premises and infrastructure improvements. The Council sought an injunction to prevent the unauthorised moorings and occupation of its land so as to be able to proceed with the Regeneration Project. In the High Court, Deputy Judge Jason Beer KC granted the final injunction, emphasising the compelling justification for preventing unauthorised moorings that obstructed essential infrastructure works. Written by Clive Adams, partner at Birketts LLP.

‘Half the truth is often a great lie’—Benjamin Franklin (Expert Tooling and Automation Ltd v Engie Power Ltd)

Commercial analysis: A case brought to the Court of Appeal challenging the High Court’s decision on the scope of fiduciary duty, informed consent and dishonesty. The court clarified that agents must fully disclose commissions (including the amount and method of funding) to avoid breaching fiduciary duties. Engie Power could only be liable as an accessory if dishonest and the court found the limitation period began when commission was paid, not when the contract was signed. The appeal was allowed in part. Written by Alexander Whatley, barrister at 3PB Chambers.

UKSC and JCPC publish final year of 2023-2026 business plan

The UK Supreme Court (UKSC) and the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) have published the final year of their three-year business plan for 2023-2026. The plan focuses on five strategic priorities and reports the successful completion of their Change Programme, which includes the launch of a new digital case management portal and the creation of new websites for the Supreme Court and the JCPC.

Music royalties co Hipgnosis revives UK dispute with Manilow

Law360, London: British music royalties firm Hipgnosis can forge ahead with its unpaid royalties case against singer Barry Manilow in the UK, after an appellate panel on 17 April 2025 overturned a pause imposed because of parallel proceedings in Los Angeles.

View Dispute Resolution by content type :  
News
Practice notes
Precedents
Q&As

Popular documents

Forum non conveniens—principles

Forum non conveniens—principlesThis Practice Note considers the doctrine of forum non conveniens, also referred to as the appropriate forum or the proper place for a dispute to be determined. This doctrine is of relevance when determining whether the courts of England and Wales have jurisdiction to

Anti-suit injunctions—principles

Anti-suit injunctions—principlesThis Practice Note considers anti-suit injunctions, a form of injunction used to restrain a party from either commencing or continuing proceedings in a foreign court. It explains what an anti-suit injunction is and the power of the courts to grant such an injunction.

Cross-border enforcement—CJJA 1982 and submission to the foreign court's jurisdiction

Cross-border enforcement—CJJA 1982 and submission to the foreign court's jurisdictionThis Practice Note considers the position under the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 (CJJA 1982) where enforcement proceedings for a foreign judgment are brought in the courts of England and Wales and there

Rome I—application and interpretation

Rome I—application and interpretationThis Practice Note provides an explanation as to when and why Regulation (EC) 593/2008, Rome I was introduced. It covers the implementation of Regulation (EC) 593/2008, Rome I and the countries which are signatories, and therefore subject to the regulation, and
Forum non conveniens—principles

Forum non conveniens—principles

Forum non conveniens—principlesThis Practice Note considers the doctrine of forum non conveniens, also referred to as the appropriate forum or the proper place for a dispute to be determined. This doctrine is of relevance when determining whether the courts of England and Wales have jurisdiction to

Anti-suit injunctions—principles

Anti-suit injunctions—principles

Anti-suit injunctions—principlesThis Practice Note considers anti-suit injunctions, a form of injunction used to restrain a party from either commencing or continuing proceedings in a foreign court. It explains what an anti-suit injunction is and the power of the courts to grant such an injunction.

Cross-border enforcement—CJJA 1982 and submission to the foreign court's jurisdiction

Cross-border enforcement—CJJA 1982 and submission to the foreign court's jurisdiction

Cross-border enforcement—CJJA 1982 and submission to the foreign court's jurisdictionThis Practice Note considers the position under the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 (CJJA 1982) where enforcement proceedings for a foreign judgment are brought in the courts of England and Wales and there

Rome I—application and interpretation

Rome I—application and interpretation

Rome I—application and interpretationThis Practice Note provides an explanation as to when and why Regulation (EC) 593/2008, Rome I was introduced. It covers the implementation of Regulation (EC) 593/2008, Rome I and the countries which are signatories, and therefore subject to the regulation, and