Defamation

Defamation is a tort which relates to the publication of a statement that has caused, or is likely to cause, serious harm to a person’s reputation.

There is no statutory definition of defamation. However, the key ingredients of the cause of action are:

  1. the publication of words or other matter that refer to the claimant

  2. an imputation from those words which is capable of causing serious harm to the claimant’s reputation, and

  3. the words cannot be proved to be true or excusable by any other legal defence (eg honest opinion or qualified privilege)

The common law test for establishing whether a statement is defamatory is whether the imputation of it would lower the claimant in the estimation of right-thinking members of society generally. However, section 1 of the Defamation Act 2013 (DA 2013) introduced a threshold requirement that a statement is not defamatory unless its publication has caused, or is likely to cause, serious harm to the reputation of the claimant, giving statutory effect to common law threshold tests. It also raised the bar from ‘substantial’ harm to ‘serious’ harm. Furthermore, in Lachaux, ...

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Dispute Resolution News

Withholding DSAR documents from inspection during data protection proceedings by relying on a D...

Information Law analysis: This claim relates to the scope of production and the application of the exemptions to production of personal data in responding fully to a subject access request. The Claimant, Thomas Cole (Cole), who was a student at the Defendant school, Marlborough College (the College), submitted a data subject access request (DSAR) under Article 15 of the United Kingdom General Data Protection Regulation, Assimilated Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (the UK GDPR) after he was removed from the school following his involvement in a physical altercation with another student. In this half-day case management hearing, Mr Justice Nicklin assessed whether the College was entitled to withhold, in whole or part, documents containing Cole’s personal data, rather than providing the material for inspection ahead of a two-day trial on the data protection claim expected to start in mid-2025. The court held that the College was entitled to withhold some documents (containing Cole’s personal data) on the grounds of the exemption in paragraph 16 of Schedule 2, Part 3 to the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA 2018). In short, this exemption provides that a controller is not obliged to disclose information to a data subject where doing so involves disclosing information that relates to another individual who can be identified from that information, whether as the source of information or as the subject of such information. Written by Robyn Bond, associate at Ropes & Gray International LLP.

View Dispute Resolution by content type :

Most recent ATED content

Practice notes

Capital gains tax charge on ATED-related gains [Archived]ARCHIVED: This Practice Note has been archived and is not maintained.The annual tax on...
10th Feb
Practice notes

ATED—reliefs and exemptionsWhat reliefs and exemptions are available?The basic charge to annual tax on enveloped dwellings (ATED) is explained in...
10th Feb
Practice notes

ATED—administration and payment of taxThe basic charge to ATED is explained in Practice Note: ATED—the basics. This Practice Note summarises how ATED...
10th Feb
Practice notes

Annual tax on enveloped dwellings (ATED)—the basicsWhat is the annual tax on enveloped dwellings?The annual tax on enveloped dwellings (ATED) was...
9th Feb
Q&As

Does annual tax on enveloped dwellings apply to a limited company housebuilder that acquires existing dwellings for conversion or demolition and...
27th Apr
Q&As

In order to qualify for property rental business relief from ATED, must the company’s sole purpose be a property rental business or may the company...
27th Apr

Popular documents