Professional negligence claims

Bringing a professional negligence claim

To assist you in understanding the key aspects of bringing and defending professional negligence claims, we have developed a series of Practice Notes, Checklists and bespoke Precedents considering all of the key aspects, both legal and from a practical perspective (including consideration of the Pre-Action Protocol for Professional Negligence claims), in the conduct of such claims.

Practice Note: Starting a professional negligence claim—a practical guide sets out the key considerations when commencing a professional negligence claim, including setting out a hypothetical scenario to illustrate the approach to a viable claim analysis, critical for pre-action action assessment of the merits.

The same hypothetical scenario is used in Practice Note: Pleading professional negligence claims—worked hypothetical examples to illustrate how to plead out a professional negligence claim:

  1. worked hypothetical professional negligence claim—particulars of claim

  2. worked hypothetical professional negligence claim—defendant request for further information

  3. worked hypothetical professional negligence claim—defence and counterclaim

  4. worked hypothetical professional negligence claim—reply and defence to counterclaim

For a generic professional negligence particulars of claim template which you can use as a precedent to plead your own

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Dispute Resolution News

Withholding DSAR documents from inspection during data protection proceedings by relying on a Data Protection Act 2018 exemption (Cole v Marlborough College)

Information Law analysis: This claim relates to the scope of production and the application of the exemptions to production of personal data in responding fully to a subject access request. The Claimant, Thomas Cole (Cole), who was a student at the Defendant school, Marlborough College (the College), submitted a data subject access request (DSAR) under Article 15 of the United Kingdom General Data Protection Regulation, Assimilated Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (the UK GDPR) after he was removed from the school following his involvement in a physical altercation with another student. In this half-day case management hearing, Mr Justice Nicklin assessed whether the College was entitled to withhold, in whole or part, documents containing Cole’s personal data, rather than providing the material for inspection ahead of a two-day trial on the data protection claim expected to start in mid-2025. The court held that the College was entitled to withhold some documents (containing Cole’s personal data) on the grounds of the exemption in paragraph 16 of Schedule 2, Part 3 to the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA 2018). In short, this exemption provides that a controller is not obliged to disclose information to a data subject where doing so involves disclosing information that relates to another individual who can be identified from that information, whether as the source of information or as the subject of such information. Written by Robyn Bond, associate at Ropes & Gray International LLP.

View Dispute Resolution by content type :

Popular documents