The economic torts

Economic torts offer protection for a person’s trade or business from acts which the law considers to be unacceptable. Although it is a fundamental element of business that businesses compete with one another and therefore to this extent, one business may succeed to the disadvantage of another, the economic torts seek to ensure that businesses are protected from acts of unacceptable interference.

The three categories of economic torts are:

  1. procuring a breach of contract (ie, interference with contractual relations) which is also referred to as ‘inducing a breach of contract’. Allied to this is the so-called ‘Marex tort’ a cause of action predicated on the defendant’s alleged intentional violation of the claimant’s rights in a judgment debt, on which, see Practice Note: The Marex tort (interference with a judgment debt)

  2. causing loss by unlawful means, sometime referred to as unlawful interference with economic interests (commonly known as ‘unlawful interference’), and

  3. conspiracy, an agreement between two or more persons either:

    1. to use means, whether lawful or otherwise, the predominant or real purpose of which is to injure the claimant (ie ‘lawful means conspiracy’ also sometimes

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Dispute Resolution News

Withholding DSAR documents from inspection during data protection proceedings by relying on a Data Protection Act 2018 exemption (Cole v Marlborough College)

Information Law analysis: This claim relates to the scope of production and the application of the exemptions to production of personal data in responding fully to a subject access request. The Claimant, Thomas Cole (Cole), who was a student at the Defendant school, Marlborough College (the College), submitted a data subject access request (DSAR) under Article 15 of the United Kingdom General Data Protection Regulation, Assimilated Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (the UK GDPR) after he was removed from the school following his involvement in a physical altercation with another student. In this half-day case management hearing, Mr Justice Nicklin assessed whether the College was entitled to withhold, in whole or part, documents containing Cole’s personal data, rather than providing the material for inspection ahead of a two-day trial on the data protection claim expected to start in mid-2025. The court held that the College was entitled to withhold some documents (containing Cole’s personal data) on the grounds of the exemption in paragraph 16 of Schedule 2, Part 3 to the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA 2018). In short, this exemption provides that a controller is not obliged to disclose information to a data subject where doing so involves disclosing information that relates to another individual who can be identified from that information, whether as the source of information or as the subject of such information. Written by Robyn Bond, associate at Ropes & Gray International LLP.

View Dispute Resolution by content type :

Popular documents