The doctrine of res judicata

A res judicata is a decision given by a judge or tribunal with jurisdiction over the cause of action and the parties, which disposes, with finality, of a matter decided so that it cannot be re-litigated by those bound by the judgment, except on appeal.

The purpose of the doctrine is to provide finality to litigation and to protect parties from being vexed by the same matter twice.

Final judgments by default or consent are included within this definition, but not decisions on procedural grounds and decisions which are not final in any sense.

‘Res judicata’ is most closely associated with the legal principle of 'cause of action estoppel' (see below), which operates to prevent a cause of action being raised or challenged by either party in subsequent proceedings where the cause of action in the later proceedings is identical to that in the earlier proceedings, the latter having been between the same parties (or their privies), and having involved the same subject matter. However, res judicata also embraces 'issue estoppel', a term that is used to describe a

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Dispute Resolution News

Dispute Resolution weekly highlights—3 April 2025

This week's edition of Dispute Resolution weekly highlights includes analysis of a number of key DR developments and key judicial decisions including the Online Procedure Rule Committee’s minutes of 10 February 2025 and the High Court decision in BNP Paribas Depositary Services Ltd v Briggs & Forrester Engineering Services Ltd (without prejudice/privilege); dates for your diary; details of our most recently published content; and other information of general interest to dispute resolution practitioners.

Withholding DSAR documents from inspection during data protection proceedings by relying on a Data Protection Act 2018 exemption (Cole v Marlborough College)

Information Law analysis: This claim relates to the scope of production and the application of the exemptions to production of personal data in responding fully to a subject access request. The Claimant, Thomas Cole (Cole), who was a student at the Defendant school, Marlborough College (the College), submitted a data subject access request (DSAR) under Article 15 of the United Kingdom General Data Protection Regulation, Assimilated Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (the UK GDPR) after he was removed from the school following his involvement in a physical altercation with another student. In this half-day case management hearing, Mr Justice Nicklin assessed whether the College was entitled to withhold, in whole or part, documents containing Cole’s personal data, rather than providing the material for inspection ahead of a two-day trial on the data protection claim expected to start in mid-2025. The court held that the College was entitled to withhold some documents (containing Cole’s personal data) on the grounds of the exemption in paragraph 16 of Schedule 2, Part 3 to the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA 2018). In short, this exemption provides that a controller is not obliged to disclose information to a data subject where doing so involves disclosing information that relates to another individual who can be identified from that information, whether as the source of information or as the subject of such information. Written by Robyn Bond, associate at Ropes & Gray International LLP.

UK declares that the Hague Judgments Convention shall extend to Scotland and Northern Ireland

On 31 March 2025, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs for the Netherlands announced that further to its declaration of 27 June 2024 extending the Hague Judgments Convention to England and Wales only, the UK has declared, in accordance with Article 25 and 30, that the Convention shall also extend to Scotland and Northern Ireland. In accordance with Article 30, this will take effect on 1 July 2025.

HMCTS announces centralisation of combined writ of control applications to CNBC

HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has announced that from 31 March 2025, all combined request applications for a certificate of judgment and the issue of a writ of control (Form N293a) must be processed through the Civil National Business Centre (CNBC) in Northampton. This applies where a judgment creditor has a County Court judgment and is seeking to transfer the proceedings to the High Court for enforcement pursuant to CPR 83.10. The CNBC will operate as an office of the Northampton District Registry for these applications. Applications should be submitted to Writs.CNBC@justice.gov.uk or by post to the CNBC. This change forms part of HMCTS's centralisation strategy, with CNBC working towards formal designation as a District Registry of the High Court. Post-issue applications such as stays will be referred to appropriate High Court District Registries.

View Dispute Resolution by content type :

News