Remedies and tax

Where a dispute is brought to an end by the payment of damages or compensation, whether under a court order or an out-of-court settlement, a number of tax issues may arise. These include:

  1. whether the recipient (the claimant) will have to pay income tax, corporation tax or capital gains tax on the amount received

  2. whether the payment is subject to VAT, and, if so, whether the person making the payment (the defendant) will have to pay VAT in addition to the main amount

  3. whether the defendant will be able to claim tax relief for the payment, and

  4. whether tax considerations (including any tax on the damages or compensation payment itself, and any tax that would have been payable but for the defendant's wrongdoing) will affect the calculation of damages

The Practice Notes in this subtopic are about these issues, ie tax considerations relating to damages or compensation payments, and are introduced in more detail below. A separate subtopic considers the remedies available to a taxpayer who has paid too much tax. This is normally about whether there is a right of recovery against

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Dispute Resolution News

Withholding DSAR documents from inspection during data protection proceedings by relying on a Data Protection Act 2018 exemption (Cole v Marlborough College)

Information Law analysis: This claim relates to the scope of production and the application of the exemptions to production of personal data in responding fully to a subject access request. The Claimant, Thomas Cole (Cole), who was a student at the Defendant school, Marlborough College (the College), submitted a data subject access request (DSAR) under Article 15 of the United Kingdom General Data Protection Regulation, Assimilated Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (the UK GDPR) after he was removed from the school following his involvement in a physical altercation with another student. In this half-day case management hearing, Mr Justice Nicklin assessed whether the College was entitled to withhold, in whole or part, documents containing Cole’s personal data, rather than providing the material for inspection ahead of a two-day trial on the data protection claim expected to start in mid-2025. The court held that the College was entitled to withhold some documents (containing Cole’s personal data) on the grounds of the exemption in paragraph 16 of Schedule 2, Part 3 to the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA 2018). In short, this exemption provides that a controller is not obliged to disclose information to a data subject where doing so involves disclosing information that relates to another individual who can be identified from that information, whether as the source of information or as the subject of such information. Written by Robyn Bond, associate at Ropes & Gray International LLP.

View Dispute Resolution by content type :

Popular documents