Contractual breach and remedies

When faced with a breach or a potential breach of contract, one of the central issues will be what remedies are available to the innocent party.

The Practice Notes in this sub-topic consider the key remedies available, ie:

  1. damages for breach of contract and the limits to recovery, and

  2. the equitable remedies such as specific performance, declaratory and injunctive relief, rectification and rescission

as well as some of the issues relevant to a finding on liability. They also include some practical illustrations of pursuing certain types of contractual claim.

Clearly, before there can be a situation requiring remedies for a breach of contract, there needs to have been a contract in existence at some point. This subtopic proceeds on the basis that a binding agreement has already been entered into between the parties and then breached or that a dispute has arisen in relation to performance. It therefore does not deal with the issues of formation, interpretation or termination of contracts. For guidance on these topics, see:

  1. Forming enforceable contracts—overview

  2. Contract interpretation—overview

  3. Terminating contracts—how and when a contract ends—overview (which

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Dispute Resolution News

Withholding DSAR documents from inspection during data protection proceedings by relying on a Data Protection Act 2018 exemption (Cole v Marlborough College)

Information Law analysis: This claim relates to the scope of production and the application of the exemptions to production of personal data in responding fully to a subject access request. The Claimant, Thomas Cole (Cole), who was a student at the Defendant school, Marlborough College (the College), submitted a data subject access request (DSAR) under Article 15 of the United Kingdom General Data Protection Regulation, Assimilated Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (the UK GDPR) after he was removed from the school following his involvement in a physical altercation with another student. In this half-day case management hearing, Mr Justice Nicklin assessed whether the College was entitled to withhold, in whole or part, documents containing Cole’s personal data, rather than providing the material for inspection ahead of a two-day trial on the data protection claim expected to start in mid-2025. The court held that the College was entitled to withhold some documents (containing Cole’s personal data) on the grounds of the exemption in paragraph 16 of Schedule 2, Part 3 to the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA 2018). In short, this exemption provides that a controller is not obliged to disclose information to a data subject where doing so involves disclosing information that relates to another individual who can be identified from that information, whether as the source of information or as the subject of such information. Written by Robyn Bond, associate at Ropes & Gray International LLP.

View Dispute Resolution by content type :

Popular documents