Cryptoassets for dispute resolution lawyers

The content in this subtopic covers digital assets, principally cryptoassets, currently commonly seen in the form of cryptocurrencies (eg Bitcoin), and smart contracts. At the heart of both is a combination of intangible property or property rights issues derived from new digital technologies. In this respect, developments in the ‘digital world’ have given rise to new issues for the lawmakers (both domestically and internationally) to grapple with. The content in this subtopic is concerned with how these technological developments are dealt with under English law and from the perspective of how issues pertaining to them may arise in the work of dispute resolution lawyers. That is, when and how rights (and obligations) in respect of such assets arise, can be identified, transferred, protected and enforced under English law.

We may also consider within this subtopic other digital assets such as NFTs (non-fungible tokens) and digital securities (ie equity or debt securities issued and transferred on ‘distributed ledger technology’ (DLT) systems) where, again, given the new technologies surrounding these assets and their creation and transfer within these new environments, they give rise to similar issues as to

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with LexisNexis or register for a free trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Latest Dispute Resolution News

Withholding DSAR documents from inspection during data protection proceedings by relying on a Data Protection Act 2018 exemption (Cole v Marlborough College)

Information Law analysis: This claim relates to the scope of production and the application of the exemptions to production of personal data in responding fully to a subject access request. The Claimant, Thomas Cole (Cole), who was a student at the Defendant school, Marlborough College (the College), submitted a data subject access request (DSAR) under Article 15 of the United Kingdom General Data Protection Regulation, Assimilated Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (the UK GDPR) after he was removed from the school following his involvement in a physical altercation with another student. In this half-day case management hearing, Mr Justice Nicklin assessed whether the College was entitled to withhold, in whole or part, documents containing Cole’s personal data, rather than providing the material for inspection ahead of a two-day trial on the data protection claim expected to start in mid-2025. The court held that the College was entitled to withhold some documents (containing Cole’s personal data) on the grounds of the exemption in paragraph 16 of Schedule 2, Part 3 to the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA 2018). In short, this exemption provides that a controller is not obliged to disclose information to a data subject where doing so involves disclosing information that relates to another individual who can be identified from that information, whether as the source of information or as the subject of such information. Written by Robyn Bond, associate at Ropes & Gray International LLP.

View Dispute Resolution by content type :

Popular documents