Home / Dispute Resolution / Claims and remedies / Cryptoassets for dispute resolution lawyers

Legal News

Crypto-Scam victim can’t trace lost £2m to Thai exchange

Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
Published on: 17 September 2024
Published by a Law360 reporter

Article summary

Law360: A judge at a London court ruled on 12 September 2024 that a victim of crypto-fraud had failed to trace the stolen money to an exchange in Thailand, the first ruling to deal with the status and treatment of cryptocurrency in English law after a full trial.

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom

Related documents:

1 Checklists
4 News
View More
6 Practice notes
View More
1 Q&As
Powered by Lexis+®

Related documents:

1 Checklists
4 News
View More
6 Practice notes
View More
1 Q&As

Popular documents

Unfair prejudice—Court of Appeal consideration of application to strike out parts of a petition (Zedra

Dispute Resolution analysis: A petitioner claiming unfair prejudice is entitled to rely on breaches by the directors of their fiduciary and statutory duties to the company as conduct of the affairs of the company which was unfairly prejudicial to the petitioner. In this case, Zedra (the petitioner)

Forming enforceable contracts—consideration

Forming enforceable contracts—considerationThis Practice Note examines the doctrine of consideration and the key role it plays in English law in determining whether a contract is enforceable.A promise will only be capable of being contractually enforced if it is either made in a deed or made in

Rescission of a contract

Rescission of a contractThis Practice Note considers the remedy of rescission, summarising when and how a contract may be rescinded (at common law, equity and under statute) and thereby brought to an end. It includes the effect of rescission, the main grounds for rescinding a contract

Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?

Negligence—when does a duty of care arise?This Practice Note considers the first question to ask when faced with a prospective claim in negligence—whether or not a duty of care exists between the claimant and the defendant such that, if the defendant has breached that duty, liability may arise.For